12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > On the Commercialization of Radical Technologie...
View graph of relations

« Back

On the Commercialization of Radical Technologies through Academic Spin-Offs – The Role of Patent Protection and Technology Dynamics

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date2010
JournalFrontiers of Entrepreneurship Research
Journal number21
Volume30
Number of pages1
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Previous empirical research has focused on the suitability of technological inventions for exploitation through firm formation (Henderson, 1993; Shane, 2001a). These studies point out that technological radicalness brings favorable conditions for firm formations. But bringing radical technologies into successful commercial application is a complex and risky process not yet fully understood (Jensen & Thursby, 2001; Prebble, de Waal & de Groot, 2008). It is therefore unclear if radical technologies provide performance advantages for firm formation.
Entrepreneurship literature states that start-ups need appropriate environmental conditions to successfully exploit technological inventions (Agarwal & Bayus, 2002; Bstieler, 2005; Gans & Stern, 2003; Wiklund & Shepherd, 2003). Dynamic phases of the technology field are expected to be favorable since technological standards are not yet established and niche markets provide opportunities for firm formation (Shane, 2001b; Tushman & Anderson, 1986). Moreover, start-ups face the threat of uncontrolled leakage of technological know-how which holds especially true for radical technologies since finding suitable applications is then a highly uncertain and time-consuming process (Bond & Houston, 2003; Jensen & Thursby, 2001).
We therefore posit that performance of technology-based start-ups is a function of its technological radicalness, and that this relationship is moderated by the pace of development in the start-up’s technological field and by the scope of its patent protection.