Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > On the inverse geostatistical problem of infere...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

On the inverse geostatistical problem of inference on missing locations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

On the inverse geostatistical problem of inference on missing locations. / Giorgi, Emanuele; Diggle, Peter John.
In: Spatial Statistics, Vol. 11, 02.2015, p. 35-44.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Giorgi E, Diggle PJ. On the inverse geostatistical problem of inference on missing locations. Spatial Statistics. 2015 Feb;11:35-44. Epub 2014 Dec 5. doi: 10.1016/j.spasta.2014.11.002

Author

Bibtex

@article{75aee76c4c104df6a777e6a7c018dd08,
title = "On the inverse geostatistical problem of inference on missing locations",
abstract = "The standard geostatistical problem is to predict the values of a spatially continuous phenomenon, S(x) say, at locations x using data (yi,xi):i=1,…,n where yi is the realisation at location xi of S(xi), or of a random variable Yi that is stochastically related to S(xi). In this paper we address the inverse problem of predicting the locations of observed measurements y. We discuss how knowledge of the sampling mechanism can and should inform a prior specification, π(x) say, for the joint distribution of the measurement locations X={xi:i=1,…,n}, and propose an efficient Metropolis–Hastings algorithm for drawing samples from the resulting predictive distribution of the missing elements of X. An important feature in many applied settings is that this predictive distribution is multi-modal, which severely limits the usefulness of simple summary measures such as the mean or median. We present three simulated examples to demonstrate the importance of the specification for π(x) and show how a one-by-one approach can lead to substantially incorrect inferences in the case of multiple unknown locations. We also analyse rainfall data from Paran{\'a} State, Brazil to show how, under additional assumptions, an empirical estimate of π(x) can be used when no prior information on the sampling design is available.",
keywords = "Geostatistics, Kernel density estimation, Missing locations, Multi-modal distributions",
author = "Emanuele Giorgi and Diggle, {Peter John}",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.spasta.2014.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "35--44",
journal = "Spatial Statistics",
issn = "2211-6753",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the inverse geostatistical problem of inference on missing locations

AU - Giorgi, Emanuele

AU - Diggle, Peter John

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - The standard geostatistical problem is to predict the values of a spatially continuous phenomenon, S(x) say, at locations x using data (yi,xi):i=1,…,n where yi is the realisation at location xi of S(xi), or of a random variable Yi that is stochastically related to S(xi). In this paper we address the inverse problem of predicting the locations of observed measurements y. We discuss how knowledge of the sampling mechanism can and should inform a prior specification, π(x) say, for the joint distribution of the measurement locations X={xi:i=1,…,n}, and propose an efficient Metropolis–Hastings algorithm for drawing samples from the resulting predictive distribution of the missing elements of X. An important feature in many applied settings is that this predictive distribution is multi-modal, which severely limits the usefulness of simple summary measures such as the mean or median. We present three simulated examples to demonstrate the importance of the specification for π(x) and show how a one-by-one approach can lead to substantially incorrect inferences in the case of multiple unknown locations. We also analyse rainfall data from Paraná State, Brazil to show how, under additional assumptions, an empirical estimate of π(x) can be used when no prior information on the sampling design is available.

AB - The standard geostatistical problem is to predict the values of a spatially continuous phenomenon, S(x) say, at locations x using data (yi,xi):i=1,…,n where yi is the realisation at location xi of S(xi), or of a random variable Yi that is stochastically related to S(xi). In this paper we address the inverse problem of predicting the locations of observed measurements y. We discuss how knowledge of the sampling mechanism can and should inform a prior specification, π(x) say, for the joint distribution of the measurement locations X={xi:i=1,…,n}, and propose an efficient Metropolis–Hastings algorithm for drawing samples from the resulting predictive distribution of the missing elements of X. An important feature in many applied settings is that this predictive distribution is multi-modal, which severely limits the usefulness of simple summary measures such as the mean or median. We present three simulated examples to demonstrate the importance of the specification for π(x) and show how a one-by-one approach can lead to substantially incorrect inferences in the case of multiple unknown locations. We also analyse rainfall data from Paraná State, Brazil to show how, under additional assumptions, an empirical estimate of π(x) can be used when no prior information on the sampling design is available.

KW - Geostatistics

KW - Kernel density estimation

KW - Missing locations

KW - Multi-modal distributions

U2 - 10.1016/j.spasta.2014.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.spasta.2014.11.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 35

EP - 44

JO - Spatial Statistics

JF - Spatial Statistics

SN - 2211-6753

ER -