The tail cut bleeding model (CUT) is routinely used in factor VIII-deficient mice to assess pharmacodynamic effects of therapeutic strategies for haemophilia A. Results from this model are highly variable, many modifications to the model are reported and at times the animals' wellbeing may be compromised by recording survival as an endpoint. We therefore investigated if the ferric chloride carotid occlusion model (COM) used for thrombosis research can be applied to enhance data quality and animal welfare in haemophilia A research. Relative dose effects and relative dose variations were calculated for the CUT and COM. The requisite sample sizes were estimated and the importance of survival rates to assess rebleeds during recovery was evaluated by correlating initial blood loss to mortality. Relative dose effects increased with higher doses in both models. The COM was more sensitive at lower doses than the CUT, had up to 82% less variation across doses and clearly showed superior accuracy. Only 5% of the sample size required for the CUT would be needed to establish non-inferiority between a specific therapeutic dose in haemophilia A mice and healthy wild-type animals. A strong statistically significant correlation was found between initial blood loss and mortality within 24 h. Our findings clearly suggest that the COM is a valid tool for assessing haemophilia A treatment in vivo. The highly reproducible data means that significantly fewer animals are required and a more humane endpoint can be used by directly assessing clot stability instead of survival rate.