Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Orientating disability studies to disablist aus...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Orientating disability studies to disablist austerity: applying Fraser’s insights

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Orientating disability studies to disablist austerity: applying Fraser’s insights. / Dodd, Steven Robert.
In: Disability and Society, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016, p. 149-165.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dodd SR. Orientating disability studies to disablist austerity: applying Fraser’s insights. Disability and Society. 2016;31(2):149-165. Epub 2016 Mar 16. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1152952

Author

Dodd, Steven Robert. / Orientating disability studies to disablist austerity : applying Fraser’s insights. In: Disability and Society. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 149-165.

Bibtex

@article{1f14245206344811a81faf56609d74f8,
title = "Orientating disability studies to disablist austerity: applying Fraser{\textquoteright}s insights",
abstract = "Many disabled people in Britain have experienced profound challenges brought about by a government policy programme characterised by {\textquoteleft}austerity{\textquoteright}. Drawing on the work of Fraser and Polanyi, this article explores new ways in which disability studies can become theoretically orientated to the task of explaining and challenging what has become an issue of overbearing importance for many disabled people. It is argued that Fraser{\textquoteright}s notion of bivalency encapsulates the combination of cultural and economic challenges which characterise {\textquoteleft}disablist austerity{\textquoteright}. Fraser{\textquoteright}s development of Polanyi{\textquoteright}s work is used to argue that disability studies should be orientated to large-scale economic challenges as well as cultural and discursive concerns that are more often the object of study in the field.",
keywords = "Austerity, redistribution, recognition, disablism, marketisation",
author = "Dodd, {Steven Robert}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/09687599.2016.1152952",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "149--165",
journal = "Disability and Society",
issn = "0968-7599",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orientating disability studies to disablist austerity

T2 - applying Fraser’s insights

AU - Dodd, Steven Robert

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Many disabled people in Britain have experienced profound challenges brought about by a government policy programme characterised by ‘austerity’. Drawing on the work of Fraser and Polanyi, this article explores new ways in which disability studies can become theoretically orientated to the task of explaining and challenging what has become an issue of overbearing importance for many disabled people. It is argued that Fraser’s notion of bivalency encapsulates the combination of cultural and economic challenges which characterise ‘disablist austerity’. Fraser’s development of Polanyi’s work is used to argue that disability studies should be orientated to large-scale economic challenges as well as cultural and discursive concerns that are more often the object of study in the field.

AB - Many disabled people in Britain have experienced profound challenges brought about by a government policy programme characterised by ‘austerity’. Drawing on the work of Fraser and Polanyi, this article explores new ways in which disability studies can become theoretically orientated to the task of explaining and challenging what has become an issue of overbearing importance for many disabled people. It is argued that Fraser’s notion of bivalency encapsulates the combination of cultural and economic challenges which characterise ‘disablist austerity’. Fraser’s development of Polanyi’s work is used to argue that disability studies should be orientated to large-scale economic challenges as well as cultural and discursive concerns that are more often the object of study in the field.

KW - Austerity

KW - redistribution

KW - recognition

KW - disablism

KW - marketisation

U2 - 10.1080/09687599.2016.1152952

DO - 10.1080/09687599.2016.1152952

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 149

EP - 165

JO - Disability and Society

JF - Disability and Society

SN - 0968-7599

IS - 2

ER -