Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > “Our biggest killer”

Electronic data

  • Our Biggest Killer final version

    Accepted author manuscript, 15.8 MB, Word document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

“Our biggest killer”: multimodal discourse representations of dementia in the British press

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

“Our biggest killer”: multimodal discourse representations of dementia in the British press. / Brookes, Gavin; Harvey, Kevin; Chadborn, Neil et al.
In: Social Semiotics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2018, p. 371-395.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brookes G, Harvey K, Chadborn N, Dening T. “Our biggest killer”: multimodal discourse representations of dementia in the British press. Social Semiotics. 2018;28(3):371-395. Epub 2017 Jun 30. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2017.1345111

Author

Brookes, Gavin ; Harvey, Kevin ; Chadborn, Neil et al. / “Our biggest killer” : multimodal discourse representations of dementia in the British press. In: Social Semiotics. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 371-395.

Bibtex

@article{61853868ad2d4d01b589ef236b10a684,
title = "“Our biggest killer”: multimodal discourse representations of dementia in the British press",
abstract = "A recent (2016) Office for National Statistics report stated that dementia is now “the leading cause of death” in England and Wales. Ever fixated with the syndrome (an unfailingly newsworthy topic), the British press was quick to respond to the bulletin, consistently headlining that dementia was the nation{\textquoteright}s “biggest killer,” while (re)formulating other aspects of the report in distorting and emotive metaphorical terms. In this paper we examine how the media, through use of a recurring set of linguistic and visual semiotic tropes, portrayed dementia as an agentive entity, a “killer,” which remorselessly attacks its “victims.” Such a broadly loaded and sensationalist representation, we argue, not only construed dementia as a direful and pernicious disease, but also, crucially, obscured the personal and social contexts in which the syndrome is understood and experienced (not least by people with dementia themselves). This intensely lurid type of representation not only fails to address the ageist misinformation and common misunderstandings that all too commonly surround dementia, but is also likely to exacerbate the stress and depression frequently experienced by people with dementia and their families.",
author = "Gavin Brookes and Kevin Harvey and Neil Chadborn and Tom Dening",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10350330.2017.1345111",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/10350330.2017.1345111",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "371--395",
journal = "Social Semiotics",
issn = "1035-0330",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Our biggest killer”

T2 - multimodal discourse representations of dementia in the British press

AU - Brookes, Gavin

AU - Harvey, Kevin

AU - Chadborn, Neil

AU - Dening, Tom

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10350330.2017.1345111

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - A recent (2016) Office for National Statistics report stated that dementia is now “the leading cause of death” in England and Wales. Ever fixated with the syndrome (an unfailingly newsworthy topic), the British press was quick to respond to the bulletin, consistently headlining that dementia was the nation’s “biggest killer,” while (re)formulating other aspects of the report in distorting and emotive metaphorical terms. In this paper we examine how the media, through use of a recurring set of linguistic and visual semiotic tropes, portrayed dementia as an agentive entity, a “killer,” which remorselessly attacks its “victims.” Such a broadly loaded and sensationalist representation, we argue, not only construed dementia as a direful and pernicious disease, but also, crucially, obscured the personal and social contexts in which the syndrome is understood and experienced (not least by people with dementia themselves). This intensely lurid type of representation not only fails to address the ageist misinformation and common misunderstandings that all too commonly surround dementia, but is also likely to exacerbate the stress and depression frequently experienced by people with dementia and their families.

AB - A recent (2016) Office for National Statistics report stated that dementia is now “the leading cause of death” in England and Wales. Ever fixated with the syndrome (an unfailingly newsworthy topic), the British press was quick to respond to the bulletin, consistently headlining that dementia was the nation’s “biggest killer,” while (re)formulating other aspects of the report in distorting and emotive metaphorical terms. In this paper we examine how the media, through use of a recurring set of linguistic and visual semiotic tropes, portrayed dementia as an agentive entity, a “killer,” which remorselessly attacks its “victims.” Such a broadly loaded and sensationalist representation, we argue, not only construed dementia as a direful and pernicious disease, but also, crucially, obscured the personal and social contexts in which the syndrome is understood and experienced (not least by people with dementia themselves). This intensely lurid type of representation not only fails to address the ageist misinformation and common misunderstandings that all too commonly surround dementia, but is also likely to exacerbate the stress and depression frequently experienced by people with dementia and their families.

U2 - 10.1080/10350330.2017.1345111

DO - 10.1080/10350330.2017.1345111

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 371

EP - 395

JO - Social Semiotics

JF - Social Semiotics

SN - 1035-0330

IS - 3

ER -