Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Ovulation monitoring and reproductive heterosex
View graph of relations

Ovulation monitoring and reproductive heterosex: living the conceptive imperative?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Ovulation monitoring and reproductive heterosex : living the conceptive imperative? / Wilkinson, Joann; Roberts, Celia; Mort, Maggie.

In: Culture, Health and Sexuality, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2015, p. 454-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{9af14f80ed4541f4abb2c8304d239ab1,
title = "Ovulation monitoring and reproductive heterosex: living the conceptive imperative?",
abstract = "Using biosensors, or devices that provide biological information to users about their own bodies, to map ovulation and time intercourse is a practice of rising significance in economically privileged countries. Based on an ethnographic study of ovulation biosensing, this paper explores the contradictions between device manufacturers' figurations of reproductive heterosex as a natural and pleasurable experience facilitated by fertility monitoring technology, and heterosexual women users' accounts of the pleasures and difficulties of ovulation monitoring and associated sexual encounters. Drawing on Science and Technology Studies and the concept of 'script', we examine the frameworks of action defined by makers of ovulation biosensors and how these are accepted, refused or remade by users. Within the scientific romance configured by manufacturers, reproductive heterosex emerges as exciting and fun, whilst the hard, 'technical' work of conception is done by ovulation technologies. Yet ovulation monitoring is described by many heterosexual women users as an exciting and yet anxiety-producing practice through which they come to know their bodies differently, often through online discussions with other women. Living a 'conceptive imperative', women engaging with ovulation sensing reconfigure their reproductive embodiment and shift their relationship to male partners in ways that reveal heterosexual 'baby-making' as a complex and nuanced practice worthy of critical engagement. ",
keywords = "biosensing, fertility, ovulation, regulation, timing of sex",
author = "Joann Wilkinson and Celia Roberts and Maggie Mort",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/13691058.2015.1005671",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "454--469",
journal = "Culture, Health and Sexuality",
issn = "1369-1058",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ovulation monitoring and reproductive heterosex

T2 - living the conceptive imperative?

AU - Wilkinson, Joann

AU - Roberts, Celia

AU - Mort, Maggie

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Using biosensors, or devices that provide biological information to users about their own bodies, to map ovulation and time intercourse is a practice of rising significance in economically privileged countries. Based on an ethnographic study of ovulation biosensing, this paper explores the contradictions between device manufacturers' figurations of reproductive heterosex as a natural and pleasurable experience facilitated by fertility monitoring technology, and heterosexual women users' accounts of the pleasures and difficulties of ovulation monitoring and associated sexual encounters. Drawing on Science and Technology Studies and the concept of 'script', we examine the frameworks of action defined by makers of ovulation biosensors and how these are accepted, refused or remade by users. Within the scientific romance configured by manufacturers, reproductive heterosex emerges as exciting and fun, whilst the hard, 'technical' work of conception is done by ovulation technologies. Yet ovulation monitoring is described by many heterosexual women users as an exciting and yet anxiety-producing practice through which they come to know their bodies differently, often through online discussions with other women. Living a 'conceptive imperative', women engaging with ovulation sensing reconfigure their reproductive embodiment and shift their relationship to male partners in ways that reveal heterosexual 'baby-making' as a complex and nuanced practice worthy of critical engagement.

AB - Using biosensors, or devices that provide biological information to users about their own bodies, to map ovulation and time intercourse is a practice of rising significance in economically privileged countries. Based on an ethnographic study of ovulation biosensing, this paper explores the contradictions between device manufacturers' figurations of reproductive heterosex as a natural and pleasurable experience facilitated by fertility monitoring technology, and heterosexual women users' accounts of the pleasures and difficulties of ovulation monitoring and associated sexual encounters. Drawing on Science and Technology Studies and the concept of 'script', we examine the frameworks of action defined by makers of ovulation biosensors and how these are accepted, refused or remade by users. Within the scientific romance configured by manufacturers, reproductive heterosex emerges as exciting and fun, whilst the hard, 'technical' work of conception is done by ovulation technologies. Yet ovulation monitoring is described by many heterosexual women users as an exciting and yet anxiety-producing practice through which they come to know their bodies differently, often through online discussions with other women. Living a 'conceptive imperative', women engaging with ovulation sensing reconfigure their reproductive embodiment and shift their relationship to male partners in ways that reveal heterosexual 'baby-making' as a complex and nuanced practice worthy of critical engagement.

KW - biosensing

KW - fertility

KW - ovulation

KW - regulation

KW - timing of sex

U2 - 10.1080/13691058.2015.1005671

DO - 10.1080/13691058.2015.1005671

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 454

EP - 469

JO - Culture, Health and Sexuality

JF - Culture, Health and Sexuality

SN - 1369-1058

IS - 4

ER -