Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Particle Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithms

Electronic data

  • Updated version of Particle Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithms

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Biometrika following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Christopher Nemeth, Chris Sherlock, and Paul Fearnhead Particle Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithms Biometrika (2016) 103 (3): 701-717 first published online August 24, 2016 doi 10.1093/biomet/asw020 is available online at: http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/content/103/3/701.abstract

    Accepted author manuscript, 586 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Particle Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithms

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>09/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Biometrika
Issue number3
Volume103
Number of pages17
Pages (from-to)701-717
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date24/08/16
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This paper proposes a new sampling scheme based on Langevin dynamics that is applicable within pseudo-marginal and particle Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. We investigate this algorithm's theoretical properties under standard asymptotics, which correspond to an increasing dimension of the parameters, $n$. Our results show that the behaviour of the algorithm depends crucially on how accurately one can estimate the gradient of the log target density.
If the error in the estimate of the gradient is not sufficiently controlled as dimension increases, then asymptotically there will be no advantage over the simpler random-walk algorithm. However, if the error is sufficiently well-behaved, then the optimal scaling of this algorithm will be $O(n^{-1/6})$ compared to $O(n^{-1/2})$ for the random walk. Our theory also gives guidelines on how to tune the number of Monte Carlo samples in the likelihood estimate and the proposal step-size.

Bibliographic note

This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Biometrika following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Christopher Nemeth, Chris Sherlock, and Paul Fearnhead Particle Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithms Biometrika (2016) 103 (3): 701-717 first published online August 24, 2016 doi 10.1093/biomet/asw020 is available online at: http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/content/103/3/701.abstract