Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37 (8), 2010, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2010 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Criminal Justice and Behavior page: http://cjb.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/
Submitted manuscript, 266 KB, PDF document
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Patterns of Interaction in Police Interviews
T2 - The Role of Cultural Dependency
AU - Beune, Karlijn
AU - Giebels, Ellen
AU - Taylor, Paul J.
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37 (8), 2010, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2010 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Criminal Justice and Behavior page: http://cjb.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/
PY - 2010/8
Y1 - 2010/8
N2 - The authors analyzed authentic, videotaped police interviews (N = 27) to examine how the use of different influencing behaviors by police officers affects the provision of information by suspects. The analysis focused on variations in cue-response patterns across suspects from cultures that tend to use more direct and content-oriented communication (i.e., low-context cultures) and cultures in which communication is typically more indirect and context orientated (i.e., high-context cultures). As expected, rational arguments were more effective in eliciting case-related personal information from low-context suspects than from high-context suspects. Contrary to the authors' expectations, high-context rather than low-context suspects seemed to respond negatively in terms of explicitly refusing to give information to police behavior coded as being kind. Additional analyses considered the effects of two types of intimidating behavior (intimidating the individual vs. the context) across the low-and high-context suspects. Results showed that intimidating the individual was more effective at eliciting case-related personal information from low-context suspects, whereas intimidating the context appeared to be more effective in eliciting case-related contextual information for high-context suspects.
AB - The authors analyzed authentic, videotaped police interviews (N = 27) to examine how the use of different influencing behaviors by police officers affects the provision of information by suspects. The analysis focused on variations in cue-response patterns across suspects from cultures that tend to use more direct and content-oriented communication (i.e., low-context cultures) and cultures in which communication is typically more indirect and context orientated (i.e., high-context cultures). As expected, rational arguments were more effective in eliciting case-related personal information from low-context suspects than from high-context suspects. Contrary to the authors' expectations, high-context rather than low-context suspects seemed to respond negatively in terms of explicitly refusing to give information to police behavior coded as being kind. Additional analyses considered the effects of two types of intimidating behavior (intimidating the individual vs. the context) across the low-and high-context suspects. Results showed that intimidating the individual was more effective at eliciting case-related personal information from low-context suspects, whereas intimidating the context appeared to be more effective in eliciting case-related contextual information for high-context suspects.
KW - police
KW - interrogation
KW - interviewing
KW - culture
KW - interaction
KW - proximity coefficient
KW - COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR
KW - CRISIS NEGOTIATIONS
KW - INTERROGATION ROOM
KW - COGNITIVE INTERVIEW
KW - CORRESPONDENCE BIAS
KW - INFLUENCE TACTICS
KW - DETECT DECEPTION
KW - UNITED-STATES
KW - CONFLICT
KW - THREATS
U2 - 10.1177/0093854810369623
DO - 10.1177/0093854810369623
M3 - Journal article
VL - 37
SP - 904
EP - 925
JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior
JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior
SN - 1552-3594
IS - 8
ER -