Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Person-ness of voices in lived experience accou...

Electronic data

  • Person-ness of voices in lived experience accounts of psychosis_revised_preprint

    Rights statement: This article has been accepted for publication in Medical Humanities, 2021 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2020-011940 © Authors (or their employer(s)) OR “© BMJ Publishing Group Ltd” ( for assignments of BMJ Case Reports)

    Accepted author manuscript, 414 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Person-ness of voices in lived experience accounts of psychosis: Combining literary linguistics and clinical psychology

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/09/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Medical Humanities
Issue number3
Volume47
Number of pages11
Pages (from-to)354-364
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date4/12/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In this paper, we use concepts and insights from the literary linguistic study of story-world characters to shed new light on the nature of voices as social agents in the context of lived-experience accounts of voice-hearing. We demonstrate a considerable overlap between approaches to voices as social agents in clinical psychology and the perception of characters in the linguistic study of fiction, but argue that the literary linguistic approach facilitates a much more nuanced account of the different degrees of person-ness voices might be perceived to possess. We propose a scalar Characterisation Model of Voices and demonstrate its explanatory potential by comparing two lived-experience descriptions of voices in interviews with voice-hearers in a psychosis intervention. The new insights into the phenomenology of voice-hearing achieved by applying the model are relevant to the understanding of voice-hearing as well as to therapeutic interventions.

Bibliographic note

This article has been accepted for publication in Medical Humanities, 2021 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2020-011940 © Authors (or their employer(s)) OR “© BMJ Publishing Group Ltd” ( for assignments of BMJ Case Reports)