Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Plant sciences and the public good.
View graph of relations

Plant sciences and the public good.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Plant sciences and the public good. / Stengel, Katrina; Taylor, Jane E.; Waterton, Claire et al.
In: Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol. 34, No. 3, 05.2009, p. 289-312.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Stengel, K, Taylor, JE, Waterton, C & Wynne, B 2009, 'Plant sciences and the public good.', Science, Technology, and Human Values, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 289-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907312955

APA

Vancouver

Stengel K, Taylor JE, Waterton C, Wynne B. Plant sciences and the public good. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2009 May;34(3):289-312. doi: 10.1177/0162243907312955

Author

Stengel, Katrina ; Taylor, Jane E. ; Waterton, Claire et al. / Plant sciences and the public good. In: Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 289-312.

Bibtex

@article{8e7cc970a235475c82ae7cd2abbc82f7,
title = "Plant sciences and the public good.",
abstract = "Drawing on interviews and observational work with practicing U.K. plant scientists, this article uses Michel Callon's work as a tool to explore the issue of collaboration between academic science and business, in particular, calls by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council for a return to {"}public good{"} plant science. In an article titled {"}Is Science a Public Good?{"} Callon contributed to the debate about the commercialization of science by suggesting that commercialization and the public good need not be incompatible. Moving away from arguments that center on the effects (positive or negative) of business involvement in science, he suggested that analysts use another model, centered on {"}diversity.{"} This model allows us to ask what society might want from science, what public good science might look like, and how public good science can be ensured while also recognizing that science cannot be easily separated from the market.",
keywords = "public good • diversity • plant genomics • commercialization",
author = "Katrina Stengel and Taylor, {Jane E.} and Claire Waterton and Brian Wynne",
year = "2009",
month = may,
doi = "10.1177/0162243907312955",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "289--312",
journal = "Science, Technology, and Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plant sciences and the public good.

AU - Stengel, Katrina

AU - Taylor, Jane E.

AU - Waterton, Claire

AU - Wynne, Brian

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Drawing on interviews and observational work with practicing U.K. plant scientists, this article uses Michel Callon's work as a tool to explore the issue of collaboration between academic science and business, in particular, calls by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council for a return to "public good" plant science. In an article titled "Is Science a Public Good?" Callon contributed to the debate about the commercialization of science by suggesting that commercialization and the public good need not be incompatible. Moving away from arguments that center on the effects (positive or negative) of business involvement in science, he suggested that analysts use another model, centered on "diversity." This model allows us to ask what society might want from science, what public good science might look like, and how public good science can be ensured while also recognizing that science cannot be easily separated from the market.

AB - Drawing on interviews and observational work with practicing U.K. plant scientists, this article uses Michel Callon's work as a tool to explore the issue of collaboration between academic science and business, in particular, calls by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council for a return to "public good" plant science. In an article titled "Is Science a Public Good?" Callon contributed to the debate about the commercialization of science by suggesting that commercialization and the public good need not be incompatible. Moving away from arguments that center on the effects (positive or negative) of business involvement in science, he suggested that analysts use another model, centered on "diversity." This model allows us to ask what society might want from science, what public good science might look like, and how public good science can be ensured while also recognizing that science cannot be easily separated from the market.

KW - public good • diversity • plant genomics • commercialization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64949154433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0162243907312955

DO - 10.1177/0162243907312955

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 289

EP - 312

JO - Science, Technology, and Human Values

JF - Science, Technology, and Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 3

ER -