Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Post-disaster recovery and sociocultural change

Electronic data

  • ArticleSocialCap_Monteiletal_Finaldocx

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101356

    Accepted author manuscript, 497 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 9/10/20

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Post-disaster recovery and sociocultural change: Rethinking social capital development for the new social fabric

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Post-disaster recovery and sociocultural change : Rethinking social capital development for the new social fabric. / Monteil, C.; Simmons, P.; Hicks, A.

In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 42, 101356, 01.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Monteil, C. ; Simmons, P. ; Hicks, A. / Post-disaster recovery and sociocultural change : Rethinking social capital development for the new social fabric. In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020 ; Vol. 42.

Bibtex

@article{33d5f20340cd4fd1b145e62a88335330,
title = "Post-disaster recovery and sociocultural change: Rethinking social capital development for the new social fabric",
abstract = "The post-disaster period is critical for reducing vulnerability and building resilience. Social capital plays an important role in generating and maintaining risk reducing behaviour and a rich evidence base demonstrating its contribution to the recovery process exists. Yet, so far little distinction has been made between the different types of social capital, despite important variations of outcomes. To address this gap, this article examines the evolving roles of specific forms of social capital on the long-term post-disaster recovery process. We explore the disaster recovery process on the active volcanic island of Montserrat in the Caribbean, marked by rapid and intense post-disaster demographic change following the beginning of the eruption in 1995. We explore the challenges of the shift from a relatively homogenous to a relatively diverse population for building a resilient society. Our investigation illustrates the complexity of the recovery process and the coexistence of conflicting objectives which, if poorly managed, can create new forms of vulnerability and impede the sustainability of the development process. We argue that not all forms of social capital development are beneficial for the long-term recovery process. In a diversifying society, bonding social capital may have perverse effect while bridging and linking social capital may be key for building social cohesion, a key contributor to sustainable development. We argue that measures for re-development should be sensitive to the long-term effects of different forms of social capital, in particular their consequences for building social cohesion, a key contributor to sustainable recovery in a dynamically changing society.",
keywords = "Cohesion, Disaster, Montserrat, Recovery, Social capital, Volcano",
author = "C. Monteil and P. Simmons and A. Hicks",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101356",
year = "2020",
month = jan
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101356",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
journal = "International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction",
issn = "2212-4209",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post-disaster recovery and sociocultural change

T2 - Rethinking social capital development for the new social fabric

AU - Monteil, C.

AU - Simmons, P.

AU - Hicks, A.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101356

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - The post-disaster period is critical for reducing vulnerability and building resilience. Social capital plays an important role in generating and maintaining risk reducing behaviour and a rich evidence base demonstrating its contribution to the recovery process exists. Yet, so far little distinction has been made between the different types of social capital, despite important variations of outcomes. To address this gap, this article examines the evolving roles of specific forms of social capital on the long-term post-disaster recovery process. We explore the disaster recovery process on the active volcanic island of Montserrat in the Caribbean, marked by rapid and intense post-disaster demographic change following the beginning of the eruption in 1995. We explore the challenges of the shift from a relatively homogenous to a relatively diverse population for building a resilient society. Our investigation illustrates the complexity of the recovery process and the coexistence of conflicting objectives which, if poorly managed, can create new forms of vulnerability and impede the sustainability of the development process. We argue that not all forms of social capital development are beneficial for the long-term recovery process. In a diversifying society, bonding social capital may have perverse effect while bridging and linking social capital may be key for building social cohesion, a key contributor to sustainable development. We argue that measures for re-development should be sensitive to the long-term effects of different forms of social capital, in particular their consequences for building social cohesion, a key contributor to sustainable recovery in a dynamically changing society.

AB - The post-disaster period is critical for reducing vulnerability and building resilience. Social capital plays an important role in generating and maintaining risk reducing behaviour and a rich evidence base demonstrating its contribution to the recovery process exists. Yet, so far little distinction has been made between the different types of social capital, despite important variations of outcomes. To address this gap, this article examines the evolving roles of specific forms of social capital on the long-term post-disaster recovery process. We explore the disaster recovery process on the active volcanic island of Montserrat in the Caribbean, marked by rapid and intense post-disaster demographic change following the beginning of the eruption in 1995. We explore the challenges of the shift from a relatively homogenous to a relatively diverse population for building a resilient society. Our investigation illustrates the complexity of the recovery process and the coexistence of conflicting objectives which, if poorly managed, can create new forms of vulnerability and impede the sustainability of the development process. We argue that not all forms of social capital development are beneficial for the long-term recovery process. In a diversifying society, bonding social capital may have perverse effect while bridging and linking social capital may be key for building social cohesion, a key contributor to sustainable development. We argue that measures for re-development should be sensitive to the long-term effects of different forms of social capital, in particular their consequences for building social cohesion, a key contributor to sustainable recovery in a dynamically changing society.

KW - Cohesion

KW - Disaster

KW - Montserrat

KW - Recovery

KW - Social capital

KW - Volcano

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101356

DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101356

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

SN - 2212-4209

M1 - 101356

ER -