Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Posthuman performativity, gender and ‘school bu...

Electronic data

  • Published Paper

    Final published version, 3.42 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Posthuman performativity, gender and ‘school bullying’: exploring the material-discursive intra-actions of skirts, hair, sluts, and poofs

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>20/08/2015
<mark>Journal</mark>Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics
Issue number2
Volume3
Number of pages37
Pages (from-to)1-37
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In this article we take off from critiques of psychological and school bullying typologies as creating problematic binary categories of bully and victim and neglecting socio-cultural aspects of gender and sexuality. We review bullying research informed by Judith Butler’s theories of discursive performativity, which help us to understand how subjectification works through performative repetitions of heterosexual gender norms. We then build on these insights
drawing on the feminist new materialist approach of Karen Barad’s posthuman performativity, which we argue enlarges our scope of inquiry in profound ways. Barad’s theories suggest we move from psychological models of the inter-
personal, and from Butlerian notions of discursive subjectification, to ideas of
discursive-material intra-action to consider the more-than-human relationalities of bullying. Throughout the article, we demonstrate the approach using examples from qualitative research with teens in the UK and Australia, exploring non-human agentic matter such as space, objects and time as shaping the constitution of gender and sexual bullying events. Specifically we examine the discursive-material agential intra-actions of skirts and hair through which ‘girl’ and ‘boy’ and ‘slut’ and ‘gay’ materialise in school spacetimematterings. In our
conclusion we briefly suggest how the new materialism helps to shift the frame of attention and responses informing gendered intra-actions in schools.