Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Power Responsibility and Justice

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Power Responsibility and Justice: A Review of Local Stakeholder Participation in European Flood Risk Management

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Power Responsibility and Justice: A Review of Local Stakeholder Participation in European Flood Risk Management. / Begg, Chloe.
In: Local Environment : The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 383-397.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Begg, C 2018, 'Power Responsibility and Justice: A Review of Local Stakeholder Participation in European Flood Risk Management', Local Environment : The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1422119

APA

Vancouver

Begg C. Power Responsibility and Justice: A Review of Local Stakeholder Participation in European Flood Risk Management. Local Environment : The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability. 2018 Apr 1;23(4):383-397. Epub 2018 Jan 17. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1422119

Author

Begg, Chloe. / Power Responsibility and Justice : A Review of Local Stakeholder Participation in European Flood Risk Management. In: Local Environment : The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability. 2018 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 383-397.

Bibtex

@article{b539ba91983d4f0e82d117c73928cb16,
title = "Power Responsibility and Justice: A Review of Local Stakeholder Participation in European Flood Risk Management",
abstract = "Over the past few decades, there has been an increasing interest in the active involvement of local stakeholders in the management of floods in Europe. Such involvement is seen as necessary as the management of floods becomes more complex. Management approaches now seek to include a range of potential measures to reduce risk (e.g. structural defence, spatial planning and property-level protection measures). Local stakeholder involvement is seen to be important because governments lack the capacities such as knowledge and funding required to deliver all these measures alone. This paper focuses on the implications that more participative approaches have on the fairness of European flood risk management (FRM). Studies of environmental justice are well placed to address this question because they are interested in who is included and excluded from decisions related to the distribution of environmental goods (resources) and bads (risks). Existing literature suggests that fair decision-making processes (procedural justice) can lead to fair distribution or resources and risks (distributive justice). This literature review of 30 peer-reviewed papers provides an analysis of justice and FRM by assessing practices of participation which are presented in the recent literature on local stakeholder involvement in FRM in England, Germany and the Netherlands. It was found that participation in practice generally focuses on transferring responsibility to the local level at the expense of power. This paper discusses the implications that this finding has for justice and synthesises potential ways forward based on recommendations of the reviewed literature.",
keywords = "Environmental justice, fairness, England, Germany, the Netherlands",
author = "Chloe Begg",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13549839.2017.1422119",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "383--397",
journal = "Local Environment : The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability",
issn = "1354-9839",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power Responsibility and Justice

T2 - A Review of Local Stakeholder Participation in European Flood Risk Management

AU - Begg, Chloe

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Over the past few decades, there has been an increasing interest in the active involvement of local stakeholders in the management of floods in Europe. Such involvement is seen as necessary as the management of floods becomes more complex. Management approaches now seek to include a range of potential measures to reduce risk (e.g. structural defence, spatial planning and property-level protection measures). Local stakeholder involvement is seen to be important because governments lack the capacities such as knowledge and funding required to deliver all these measures alone. This paper focuses on the implications that more participative approaches have on the fairness of European flood risk management (FRM). Studies of environmental justice are well placed to address this question because they are interested in who is included and excluded from decisions related to the distribution of environmental goods (resources) and bads (risks). Existing literature suggests that fair decision-making processes (procedural justice) can lead to fair distribution or resources and risks (distributive justice). This literature review of 30 peer-reviewed papers provides an analysis of justice and FRM by assessing practices of participation which are presented in the recent literature on local stakeholder involvement in FRM in England, Germany and the Netherlands. It was found that participation in practice generally focuses on transferring responsibility to the local level at the expense of power. This paper discusses the implications that this finding has for justice and synthesises potential ways forward based on recommendations of the reviewed literature.

AB - Over the past few decades, there has been an increasing interest in the active involvement of local stakeholders in the management of floods in Europe. Such involvement is seen as necessary as the management of floods becomes more complex. Management approaches now seek to include a range of potential measures to reduce risk (e.g. structural defence, spatial planning and property-level protection measures). Local stakeholder involvement is seen to be important because governments lack the capacities such as knowledge and funding required to deliver all these measures alone. This paper focuses on the implications that more participative approaches have on the fairness of European flood risk management (FRM). Studies of environmental justice are well placed to address this question because they are interested in who is included and excluded from decisions related to the distribution of environmental goods (resources) and bads (risks). Existing literature suggests that fair decision-making processes (procedural justice) can lead to fair distribution or resources and risks (distributive justice). This literature review of 30 peer-reviewed papers provides an analysis of justice and FRM by assessing practices of participation which are presented in the recent literature on local stakeholder involvement in FRM in England, Germany and the Netherlands. It was found that participation in practice generally focuses on transferring responsibility to the local level at the expense of power. This paper discusses the implications that this finding has for justice and synthesises potential ways forward based on recommendations of the reviewed literature.

KW - Environmental justice

KW - fairness

KW - England

KW - Germany

KW - the Netherlands

U2 - 10.1080/13549839.2017.1422119

DO - 10.1080/13549839.2017.1422119

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 383

EP - 397

JO - Local Environment : The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability

JF - Local Environment : The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability

SN - 1354-9839

IS - 4

ER -