12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Predictors of early numeracy: Is there a place ...
View graph of relations

« Back

Predictors of early numeracy: Is there a place for mistakes when learning about number?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date19/11/2007
JournalBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology
Journal number4
Volume25
Number of pages16
Pages543-558
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

It is one thing to be able to count and share items proficiently, but it is another thing to know how counting and sharing establish and identify quantity. The aim of the study was to identify which measures of numerical knowledge predict children's success on simple number problems, where counting and set equivalence are at issue. Seventy-two 5-year-olds were given a battery of nine tasks on each of three sessions (at 3-monthly intervals). Tasks measured procedural proficiency, conceptual understanding (using an error-detection paradigm) and the ability to compare sets using number knowledge. Procedural skills remained fairly stable over the 6-month period, and preceded children's ability to detect another's violations to those procedures. Regression analysis revealed that children who are sensitive to procedural errors in another's counting and sharing are more likely to recognize the significance of cardinal numbers for set comparisons. We suggest that although children's conceptual understanding of well-rehearsed routines is often limited, conceptual insight might be achieved by setting tasks that require reflection rather than practice.

Bibliographic note

The field of this paper is arithmetic, education, developmental psychology and focuses on early numeracy. This study examined the roles of sharing and sensitivity to another's counting errors. Regression analysis revealed that children who are sensitive to procedural errors in another's counting and sharing are more likely to recognize the significance of cardinal numbers for set comparisons. We suggest that, although children's conceptual understanding of well-rehearsed routines is often limited, conceptual insight might be achieved by setting tasks that require reflection rather than practice. The data show clearly sharing as a predictor of early numeracy understanding. Its method is experimental & longitudinal and was referred blind by 3 experts. As co-author I had 33% responsibility. RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Education