Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Preserving the past

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Preserving the past: an early interview improves delayed event memory in children with intellectual disabilities

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Preserving the past: an early interview improves delayed event memory in children with intellectual disabilities. / Brown, Deirdre; Lewis, Charlie; Lamb, Michael.
In: Child Development, Vol. 86, No. 4, 07.2015, p. 1031-1047.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Brown, D, Lewis, C & Lamb, M 2015, 'Preserving the past: an early interview improves delayed event memory in children with intellectual disabilities', Child Development, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1031-1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12364

APA

Brown, D., Lewis, C., & Lamb, M. (2015). Preserving the past: an early interview improves delayed event memory in children with intellectual disabilities. Child Development, 86(4), 1031-1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12364

Vancouver

Brown D, Lewis C, Lamb M. Preserving the past: an early interview improves delayed event memory in children with intellectual disabilities. Child Development. 2015 Jul;86(4):1031-1047. Epub 2015 Apr 15. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12364

Author

Brown, Deirdre ; Lewis, Charlie ; Lamb, Michael. / Preserving the past : an early interview improves delayed event memory in children with intellectual disabilities. In: Child Development. 2015 ; Vol. 86, No. 4. pp. 1031-1047.

Bibtex

@article{8a5674b0f6d94c70a9431d08975cea95,
title = "Preserving the past: an early interview improves delayed event memory in children with intellectual disabilities",
abstract = "The influence of an early interview on children{\textquoteright}s (N = 194) later recall of an experienced event was examined in children with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities (CWID; 7–12 years) and typically developing (TD) children matched for chronological (7–12 years) or mental (4–9 years) age. Children previously interviewed were more informative, more accurate, and less suggestible. CWID (mild) recalled as much information as TD mental age matches, and were as accurate as TD chronological age matches. CWID (moderate) recalled less than TD mental age matches but were as accurate. Interviewers should elicit CWID{\textquoteright}s recall as early as possi- ble and consider developmental level and severity of impairments when evaluating eyewitness testimony.",
author = "Deirdre Brown and Charlie Lewis and Michael Lamb",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1111/cdev.12364",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "1031--1047",
journal = "Child Development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preserving the past

T2 - an early interview improves delayed event memory in children with intellectual disabilities

AU - Brown, Deirdre

AU - Lewis, Charlie

AU - Lamb, Michael

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - The influence of an early interview on children’s (N = 194) later recall of an experienced event was examined in children with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities (CWID; 7–12 years) and typically developing (TD) children matched for chronological (7–12 years) or mental (4–9 years) age. Children previously interviewed were more informative, more accurate, and less suggestible. CWID (mild) recalled as much information as TD mental age matches, and were as accurate as TD chronological age matches. CWID (moderate) recalled less than TD mental age matches but were as accurate. Interviewers should elicit CWID’s recall as early as possi- ble and consider developmental level and severity of impairments when evaluating eyewitness testimony.

AB - The influence of an early interview on children’s (N = 194) later recall of an experienced event was examined in children with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities (CWID; 7–12 years) and typically developing (TD) children matched for chronological (7–12 years) or mental (4–9 years) age. Children previously interviewed were more informative, more accurate, and less suggestible. CWID (mild) recalled as much information as TD mental age matches, and were as accurate as TD chronological age matches. CWID (moderate) recalled less than TD mental age matches but were as accurate. Interviewers should elicit CWID’s recall as early as possi- ble and consider developmental level and severity of impairments when evaluating eyewitness testimony.

U2 - 10.1111/cdev.12364

DO - 10.1111/cdev.12364

M3 - Journal article

VL - 86

SP - 1031

EP - 1047

JO - Child Development

JF - Child Development

SN - 0009-3920

IS - 4

ER -