Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Priming the comprehension of German object rela...

Electronic data

  • Priming_the_Comprehension_of_German_Object_Relative_Clausee_accepted

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [Language Learning and Development on 04/01/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15475441.2016.1235500

    Accepted author manuscript, 690 KB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Priming the comprehension of German object relative clauses

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

E-pub ahead of print
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>4/01/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Language Learning and Development
Issue number3
Number of pages21
Pages (from-to)241-261
<mark>State</mark>E-pub ahead of print
Early online date4/01/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English


Structural priming is a useful laboratory-based technique for investigating how children respond to temporary changes in the distribution of structures in their input. In the current study we investigated whether increasing the number of object relative clauses (RCs) in German-speaking children’s input changes their processing preferences for ambiguous RCs. Fifty-one 6-year-olds and 54 9-year-olds participated in a priming task that (i) gauged their baseline interpretations for ambiguous RC structures, (ii) primed an object-RC interpretation of ambiguous RCs, and (iii) determined whether priming persevered beyond immediate prime-target pairs. The 6-year old children showed no priming effect, whereas the 9-year-old group showed robust priming that was long lasting. Unlike in studies of priming in production, priming did not increase in magnitude when there was lexical overlap between prime and target. Overall, the results suggest that increased exposure to object RCs facilitates children’s interpretation of this otherwise infrequent structure, but only in older children. The implications for acquisition theory are discussed.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor //////