Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Private rights vs public standards in the WTO.

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Private rights vs public standards in the WTO.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Private rights vs public standards in the WTO. / Picciotto, Salomone.
In: Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 10, No. 3, 06.2003, p. 377-405.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Picciotto, S 2003, 'Private rights vs public standards in the WTO.', Review of International Political Economy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 377-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969229032000091594

APA

Picciotto, S. (2003). Private rights vs public standards in the WTO. Review of International Political Economy, 10(3), 377-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969229032000091594

Vancouver

Picciotto S. Private rights vs public standards in the WTO. Review of International Political Economy. 2003 Jun;10(3):377-405. doi: 10.1080/0969229032000091594

Author

Picciotto, Salomone. / Private rights vs public standards in the WTO. In: Review of International Political Economy. 2003 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 377-405.

Bibtex

@article{c0f8a2dc9e6849969c42fab97e94ad6f,
title = "Private rights vs public standards in the WTO.",
abstract = "The WTO is a central node of the re-regulation of the global economy. The priority it gives to liberalization makes it inappropriate for further `constitutionalization', as some have argued, since this would further entrench a neo-liberal form of regulation. A better balance between the market-opening obligations of the WTO and national and international regulatory standards requires more deference by the WTO to the appropriate roles of other bodies, as well as to national states, for example by applying the `margin of appreciation' principle.",
keywords = "WTO trade global governance node",
author = "Salomone Picciotto",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Review of International Political Economy, 10 (3), 2003, {\textcopyright} Informa Plc",
year = "2003",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1080/0969229032000091594",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "377--405",
journal = "Review of International Political Economy",
issn = "0969-2290",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Private rights vs public standards in the WTO.

AU - Picciotto, Salomone

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Review of International Political Economy, 10 (3), 2003, © Informa Plc

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - The WTO is a central node of the re-regulation of the global economy. The priority it gives to liberalization makes it inappropriate for further `constitutionalization', as some have argued, since this would further entrench a neo-liberal form of regulation. A better balance between the market-opening obligations of the WTO and national and international regulatory standards requires more deference by the WTO to the appropriate roles of other bodies, as well as to national states, for example by applying the `margin of appreciation' principle.

AB - The WTO is a central node of the re-regulation of the global economy. The priority it gives to liberalization makes it inappropriate for further `constitutionalization', as some have argued, since this would further entrench a neo-liberal form of regulation. A better balance between the market-opening obligations of the WTO and national and international regulatory standards requires more deference by the WTO to the appropriate roles of other bodies, as well as to national states, for example by applying the `margin of appreciation' principle.

KW - WTO trade global governance node

U2 - 10.1080/0969229032000091594

DO - 10.1080/0969229032000091594

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 377

EP - 405

JO - Review of International Political Economy

JF - Review of International Political Economy

SN - 0969-2290

IS - 3

ER -