Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Eng...
View graph of relations

Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design. / Ball, Linden J.; Evans, Jonathan St. B.; Dennis, Ian Dennis et al.
In: Thinking and Reasoning, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1997, p. 247-270.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Ball, LJ, Evans, JSB, Dennis, ID & Ormerod, TC 1997, 'Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design.', Thinking and Reasoning, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 247-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467897394284

APA

Vancouver

Ball LJ, Evans JSB, Dennis ID, Ormerod TC. Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design. Thinking and Reasoning. 1997;3(4):247-270. doi: 10.1080/135467897394284

Author

Ball, Linden J. ; Evans, Jonathan St. B. ; Dennis, Ian Dennis et al. / Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design. In: Thinking and Reasoning. 1997 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 247-270.

Bibtex

@article{965ba861fcc4414db908613840be8510,
title = "Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design.",
abstract = "A study is reported which focused on the problem-solving strategies employed by expert electronics engineers pursuing a real-world task: integrated-circuit design. Verbal protocol data were analysed so as to reveal aspects of the organisation and sequencing of ongoing design activity. These analyses indicated that the designers were implementing a highly systematic solution-development strategy which deviated only a small degree from a normatively optimal top-down and breadth-first method. Although some of the observed deviation could be described as opportunistic in nature, much of it reflected the rapid depth-first exploration of tentative solution ideas. We argue that switches from a predominantly breadth-first mode of problem solving to depth-first or opportunistic modes may be an important aspect of the expert{\textquoteright}s strategic knowledge about how to conduct the design process effectively when faced with difficulties, uncertainties, and design impasses.",
author = "Ball, {Linden J.} and Evans, {Jonathan St. B.} and Dennis, {Ian Dennis} and Ormerod, {Thomas C.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1080/135467897394284",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "247--270",
journal = "Thinking and Reasoning",
issn = "1354-6783",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design.

AU - Ball, Linden J.

AU - Evans, Jonathan St. B.

AU - Dennis, Ian Dennis

AU - Ormerod, Thomas C.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - A study is reported which focused on the problem-solving strategies employed by expert electronics engineers pursuing a real-world task: integrated-circuit design. Verbal protocol data were analysed so as to reveal aspects of the organisation and sequencing of ongoing design activity. These analyses indicated that the designers were implementing a highly systematic solution-development strategy which deviated only a small degree from a normatively optimal top-down and breadth-first method. Although some of the observed deviation could be described as opportunistic in nature, much of it reflected the rapid depth-first exploration of tentative solution ideas. We argue that switches from a predominantly breadth-first mode of problem solving to depth-first or opportunistic modes may be an important aspect of the expert’s strategic knowledge about how to conduct the design process effectively when faced with difficulties, uncertainties, and design impasses.

AB - A study is reported which focused on the problem-solving strategies employed by expert electronics engineers pursuing a real-world task: integrated-circuit design. Verbal protocol data were analysed so as to reveal aspects of the organisation and sequencing of ongoing design activity. These analyses indicated that the designers were implementing a highly systematic solution-development strategy which deviated only a small degree from a normatively optimal top-down and breadth-first method. Although some of the observed deviation could be described as opportunistic in nature, much of it reflected the rapid depth-first exploration of tentative solution ideas. We argue that switches from a predominantly breadth-first mode of problem solving to depth-first or opportunistic modes may be an important aspect of the expert’s strategic knowledge about how to conduct the design process effectively when faced with difficulties, uncertainties, and design impasses.

U2 - 10.1080/135467897394284

DO - 10.1080/135467897394284

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 247

EP - 270

JO - Thinking and Reasoning

JF - Thinking and Reasoning

SN - 1354-6783

IS - 4

ER -