Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Professional ethics and the 'good' of science.

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Professional ethics and the 'good' of science.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Professional ethics and the 'good' of science. / Chadwick, Ruth.
In: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 30, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 247-256.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Chadwick, R 2005, 'Professional ethics and the 'good' of science.', Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801805X42054

APA

Chadwick, R. (2005). Professional ethics and the 'good' of science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 30(3), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801805X42054

Vancouver

Chadwick R. Professional ethics and the 'good' of science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2005 Sept;30(3):247-256. doi: 10.1179/030801805X42054

Author

Chadwick, Ruth. / Professional ethics and the 'good' of science. In: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2005 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 247-256.

Bibtex

@article{eb03f39257df41239e40b8d1774bb17d,
title = "Professional ethics and the 'good' of science.",
abstract = "Proposals for an ethical code for scientists raise questions about the usefulness of the framework of professional ethics for debating relevant issues surrounding ethics and science. Is science a profession and if so should its professional ethic be self-derived or subject to external input? What needs to be addressed is the nature of the 'good' that science promotes. Explanations of science as a public good in terms of knowledge and diversity are possibilities, but science's answer to the basic philosophical question of hope in the human condition should not be overlooked.",
author = "Ruth Chadwick",
year = "2005",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1179/030801805X42054",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "247--256",
journal = "Interdisciplinary Science Reviews",
issn = "1743-2790",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional ethics and the 'good' of science.

AU - Chadwick, Ruth

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Proposals for an ethical code for scientists raise questions about the usefulness of the framework of professional ethics for debating relevant issues surrounding ethics and science. Is science a profession and if so should its professional ethic be self-derived or subject to external input? What needs to be addressed is the nature of the 'good' that science promotes. Explanations of science as a public good in terms of knowledge and diversity are possibilities, but science's answer to the basic philosophical question of hope in the human condition should not be overlooked.

AB - Proposals for an ethical code for scientists raise questions about the usefulness of the framework of professional ethics for debating relevant issues surrounding ethics and science. Is science a profession and if so should its professional ethic be self-derived or subject to external input? What needs to be addressed is the nature of the 'good' that science promotes. Explanations of science as a public good in terms of knowledge and diversity are possibilities, but science's answer to the basic philosophical question of hope in the human condition should not be overlooked.

U2 - 10.1179/030801805X42054

DO - 10.1179/030801805X42054

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 247

EP - 256

JO - Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

JF - Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

SN - 1743-2790

IS - 3

ER -