Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Professional practices and opinions about servi...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Survey_FULL_DOCUMENT_revised_Final (1)

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Communication Disorders. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Communication Disorders, 63, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.05.004

    Accepted author manuscript, 271 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Professional practices and opinions about services available to bilingual children with developmental disabilities: an international study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • Stefka H. Marinova-Todd
  • Paola Colozzo
  • Pat Mirenda
  • Hillary Stahl
  • Elizabeth Kay-Raining Bird
  • Karisa Parkington
  • Katherine Elizabeth Cain
  • Julia Scherba de Valenzuela
  • Eliane Segers
  • Andrea A. N. MacLeod
  • Fred Genesee
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/09/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Communication Disorders
Volume63
Number of pages16
Pages (from-to)47-62
Publication statusPublished
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This study aimed to gather information from school- and clinic-based professionals about their practices and opinions pertaining to the provision of bilingual supports to students with developmental disabilities. Using an online survey, data were collected in six socio-culturally and linguistically diverse locations across four countries: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. In total, 361 surveys were included in the analysis from respondents who were primarily teachers and speech-language pathologists working in schools, daycares/preschools, or community-based clinics. The overall picture that emerged from the data reflected a disconnection between practice and opinion. In general, respondents believed that children with both mild and severe disabilities are capable of learning a second language, although their opinions were more neutral for the latter group. However, children with both mild and severe disabilities who spoke only a minority language at home had less access to services for second language learners than did their typically developing peers, although respondents agreed that such services should be more available. Regardless of clinical group, children who lived in homes where a minority language was spoken were often exposed to, assessed in, and treated in the majority language only; again, respondents generally disagreed with these practices. Finally, second language classes were less available to children in the two disability groups compared to typically developing bilingual children, with general agreement that the opportunity to acquire a second language should be more available, especially to those with mild disabilities. Although the results indicate that there is a considerable gap between current practices and professional opinions, professionals appear to be more supportive of bilingual educational opportunities for these populations than was suggested by previous research.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Communication Disorders. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Communication Disorders, 63, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.05.004