Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Quantifying the helium and hydrocarbon accumula...

Electronic data

  • Chemical Geology_Helium in North Qaidam basin

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Chemical Geology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Chemical Geology, 525, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.07.020

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.17 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 18/07/20

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Quantifying the helium and hydrocarbon accumulation processes using noble gases in the North Qaidam Basin, China

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>20/10/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Chemical Geology
Volume525
Number of pages12
Pages (from-to)368-379
Publication statusPublished
Early online date18/07/19
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Limited reserves and insecure resource supply have led to global shortage crises in helium, a vital gas for cryogenic engineering and other countless industrial manufacturing processes. Despite the attention drawn by global supply disruptions, the helium accumulation mechanism in natural gas fields remains poorly understood. Noble gases are excellent tracers for studying migration and accumulation processes of fluids in the subsurface and can be used to investigate the influence of subsurface fluids on helium accumulation. We present noble gas isotope and abundance data as well as major gas compositional data from 10 producing wells in three gas fields in the North Qaidam Basin, China. Helium is more concentrated in the Mabei and Dongping gas fields (2.06–48.4 × 10−4 cm3 STP/cm3) than in the Niudong gas field (1.15–1.42 × 10−4 cm3 STP/cm3). The helium is mainly radiogenic, with 3He/4He ratios of 0.01–0.05 Ra, where Ra is the atmospheric value of 3He/4He, and lacks significant contribution from the mantle (0.03–0.67%). The noble gases derived from air-saturated water (20Ne, 36Ar, 84Kr and 130Xe) can be explained by an oil-modified groundwater-exsolution model with excess heavy noble gases. The calculated Voil/Vwater and Vgas/Vwater ratios indicate that the Mabei region is the most oil-rich area and the Dongping region has the driest natural gas, which is consistent with the geological context. These ratios further support the fractionation models. The strong linear relationship between 4He and 20Ne (R2 = 0.98) suggested that 4He was dissolved into groundwater before migrating into the oil or gas phase. The initial 4He concentrations in groundwater can accumulate within 0.31–2.78 Myr assuming a 4He flux from the entire crustal section. According to the fractionation model, helium in groundwater partitions into the gas phase when contacting hydrocarbons. The different volume ratios among oil, gas and water during the equilibration process cause much greater variability in the helium concentrations in the gas phase (e.g., 6.08 × 10−4 to 2.01 × 10−3 cm3 STP/cm3 in Mabei) than those in the groundwater phase (e.g. 9.18 × 10−3 to 1.39 × 10−2 cm3 4He STP/cm3 H2O in Mabei). Hydrocarbons play a critical role in helium accumulation and dilution. Helium-rich natural gas fields are characterized by old groundwater systems and moderate hydrocarbon abundance. This study has succeeded in quantitatively assessing the helium accumulation process in natural gas fields in the North Qaidam Basin and revealed that both groundwater and hydrocarbon phases control the helium accumulation in the subsurface environment. This outcome has broad implications for the prediction of hydrocarbon and helium as resources.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Chemical Geology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Chemical Geology, 525, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.07.020