Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Pr...
View graph of relations

Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Problem

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Problem. / Unwin, Nicholas.
In: The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 196, 07.1999, p. 337-352.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Unwin, N 1999, 'Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Problem', The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 196, pp. 337-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00146

APA

Vancouver

Unwin N. Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Problem. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1999 Jul;49(196):337-352. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00146

Author

Unwin, Nicholas. / Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Problem. In: The Philosophical Quarterly. 1999 ; Vol. 49, No. 196. pp. 337-352.

Bibtex

@article{99bcefb93ab247a49f811bb7dd2d466c,
title = "Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Problem",
abstract = "Every expressivist theory of moral language requires a solution to the Frege-Geach problem, i.e., the problem of explaining how moral sentences retain their meaning in unasserted (e.g., conditional and disjunctive) contexts. An essential part of Blackburn{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}quasi-realist project{\textquoteright}, i.e., the project of showing how we can earn the right to treat moral sentences as if they have ordinary truth-conditions, is to provide a sophisticated solution. I show, however, that simple negated contexts provide a fundamental difficulty, since accepting the negation of a sentence is easily confused with merely refusing to accept that sentence. I argue that Blackburn{\textquoteright}s model-set semantics for his {\textquoteleft}Hooray!{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}Boo!{\textquoteright} operators requires logical apparatus to which he is not entitled. I consider various modifications, but show that they do not succeed.",
author = "Nicholas Unwin",
year = "1999",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1111/1467-9213.00146",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "337--352",
journal = "The Philosophical Quarterly",
issn = "1467-9213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "196",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Problem

AU - Unwin, Nicholas

PY - 1999/7

Y1 - 1999/7

N2 - Every expressivist theory of moral language requires a solution to the Frege-Geach problem, i.e., the problem of explaining how moral sentences retain their meaning in unasserted (e.g., conditional and disjunctive) contexts. An essential part of Blackburn’s ‘quasi-realist project’, i.e., the project of showing how we can earn the right to treat moral sentences as if they have ordinary truth-conditions, is to provide a sophisticated solution. I show, however, that simple negated contexts provide a fundamental difficulty, since accepting the negation of a sentence is easily confused with merely refusing to accept that sentence. I argue that Blackburn’s model-set semantics for his ‘Hooray!’ and ‘Boo!’ operators requires logical apparatus to which he is not entitled. I consider various modifications, but show that they do not succeed.

AB - Every expressivist theory of moral language requires a solution to the Frege-Geach problem, i.e., the problem of explaining how moral sentences retain their meaning in unasserted (e.g., conditional and disjunctive) contexts. An essential part of Blackburn’s ‘quasi-realist project’, i.e., the project of showing how we can earn the right to treat moral sentences as if they have ordinary truth-conditions, is to provide a sophisticated solution. I show, however, that simple negated contexts provide a fundamental difficulty, since accepting the negation of a sentence is easily confused with merely refusing to accept that sentence. I argue that Blackburn’s model-set semantics for his ‘Hooray!’ and ‘Boo!’ operators requires logical apparatus to which he is not entitled. I consider various modifications, but show that they do not succeed.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9213.00146

DO - 10.1111/1467-9213.00146

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 337

EP - 352

JO - The Philosophical Quarterly

JF - The Philosophical Quarterly

SN - 1467-9213

IS - 196

ER -