Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Question Asking During Reading Comprehension In...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Question Asking During Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Corpus Study of How Question Type Influences the Linguistic Complexity of Primary School Students’ Responses

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Question Asking During Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Corpus Study of How Question Type Influences the Linguistic Complexity of Primary School Students’ Responses. / Blything, L.P.; Hardie, A.; Cain, K.
In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 3, 01.07.2020, p. 443-472.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{511e3f2615c64a47ad2d45b98b4786d4,
title = "Question Asking During Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Corpus Study of How Question Type Influences the Linguistic Complexity of Primary School Students{\textquoteright} Responses",
abstract = "The authors examined teachers{\textquoteright} (N = 19) use of different question types during small‐group comprehension instruction for 6–11‐year‐olds (N = 115). The authors tagged the corpus of 40 hours of guided reading sessions to enable computer‐based searches for syntactic forms of questions. Teachers frequently asked high‐challenge wh‐ word questions (e.g., “How does that fit in with what you just read?”), and this was more pronounced in schools located in regions of low socioeconomic status, a finding associated with recency of completion of teacher training. Students{\textquoteright} responses were more linguistically complex when teacher questions comprised a high frequency of high‐challenge questions, particularly wh‐ word adverb questions (predominantly why and how). These findings applied across the wide age and ability range of the sample, indicating that high‐challenge questions are effective in small‐group comprehension instruction for students in different age groups and at various levels of reading ability. The authors conclude that teachers benefit from being informed about the effect of various syntactic forms of questions, particularly the nuances of wh‐ word questions. The findings also highlight the advantages of using corpus search methods to examine the influence of teacher question‐asking strategies during classroom interactions.",
keywords = "Comprehension, Methodological perspectives, Instructional strategies; methods and materials, Vygotskian, Cognitive, Classroom Discourse, Comprehension Instruction, Discussion Strategies, Correlation, ANOVAs, 2‐Childhood",
author = "L.P. Blything and A. Hardie and K. Cain",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/rrq.279",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "443--472",
journal = "Reading Research Quarterly",
issn = "0034-0553",
publisher = "International Reading Association",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Question Asking During Reading Comprehension Instruction

T2 - A Corpus Study of How Question Type Influences the Linguistic Complexity of Primary School Students’ Responses

AU - Blything, L.P.

AU - Hardie, A.

AU - Cain, K.

PY - 2020/7/1

Y1 - 2020/7/1

N2 - The authors examined teachers’ (N = 19) use of different question types during small‐group comprehension instruction for 6–11‐year‐olds (N = 115). The authors tagged the corpus of 40 hours of guided reading sessions to enable computer‐based searches for syntactic forms of questions. Teachers frequently asked high‐challenge wh‐ word questions (e.g., “How does that fit in with what you just read?”), and this was more pronounced in schools located in regions of low socioeconomic status, a finding associated with recency of completion of teacher training. Students’ responses were more linguistically complex when teacher questions comprised a high frequency of high‐challenge questions, particularly wh‐ word adverb questions (predominantly why and how). These findings applied across the wide age and ability range of the sample, indicating that high‐challenge questions are effective in small‐group comprehension instruction for students in different age groups and at various levels of reading ability. The authors conclude that teachers benefit from being informed about the effect of various syntactic forms of questions, particularly the nuances of wh‐ word questions. The findings also highlight the advantages of using corpus search methods to examine the influence of teacher question‐asking strategies during classroom interactions.

AB - The authors examined teachers’ (N = 19) use of different question types during small‐group comprehension instruction for 6–11‐year‐olds (N = 115). The authors tagged the corpus of 40 hours of guided reading sessions to enable computer‐based searches for syntactic forms of questions. Teachers frequently asked high‐challenge wh‐ word questions (e.g., “How does that fit in with what you just read?”), and this was more pronounced in schools located in regions of low socioeconomic status, a finding associated with recency of completion of teacher training. Students’ responses were more linguistically complex when teacher questions comprised a high frequency of high‐challenge questions, particularly wh‐ word adverb questions (predominantly why and how). These findings applied across the wide age and ability range of the sample, indicating that high‐challenge questions are effective in small‐group comprehension instruction for students in different age groups and at various levels of reading ability. The authors conclude that teachers benefit from being informed about the effect of various syntactic forms of questions, particularly the nuances of wh‐ word questions. The findings also highlight the advantages of using corpus search methods to examine the influence of teacher question‐asking strategies during classroom interactions.

KW - Comprehension

KW - Methodological perspectives, Instructional strategies; methods and materials

KW - Vygotskian

KW - Cognitive

KW - Classroom Discourse

KW - Comprehension Instruction

KW - Discussion Strategies

KW - Correlation

KW - ANOVAs

KW - 2‐Childhood

U2 - 10.1002/rrq.279

DO - 10.1002/rrq.279

M3 - Journal article

VL - 55

SP - 443

EP - 472

JO - Reading Research Quarterly

JF - Reading Research Quarterly

SN - 0034-0553

IS - 3

ER -