Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reconciling community resource requirements in ...
View graph of relations

Reconciling community resource requirements in U-Nets

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Reconciling community resource requirements in U-Nets. / Bury, Sara; Ishmael, Johnathan; Race, Nicholas J.P. et al.
Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on User-provided networking: challenges and opportunities. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009. p. 19-24 (U-NET '09).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Bury, S, Ishmael, J, Race, NJP, Rouncefield, M & Smith, P 2009, Reconciling community resource requirements in U-Nets. in Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on User-provided networking: challenges and opportunities. U-NET '09, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/1659029.1659035

APA

Bury, S., Ishmael, J., Race, N. J. P., Rouncefield, M., & Smith, P. (2009). Reconciling community resource requirements in U-Nets. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on User-provided networking: challenges and opportunities (pp. 19-24). (U-NET '09). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1659029.1659035

Vancouver

Bury S, Ishmael J, Race NJP, Rouncefield M, Smith P. Reconciling community resource requirements in U-Nets. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on User-provided networking: challenges and opportunities. New York, NY, USA: ACM. 2009. p. 19-24. (U-NET '09). doi: 10.1145/1659029.1659035

Author

Bury, Sara ; Ishmael, Johnathan ; Race, Nicholas J.P. et al. / Reconciling community resource requirements in U-Nets. Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on User-provided networking: challenges and opportunities. New York, NY, USA : ACM, 2009. pp. 19-24 (U-NET '09).

Bibtex

@inproceedings{a73f597b2dbb4c249c3a2cae3ff43369,
title = "Reconciling community resource requirements in U-Nets",
abstract = "A challenge for future user-provided networks will be reconciling potentially conflicting demands for a finite resource, such as network bandwidth. In this position paper, we discuss how this problem is tackled in an operational community-driven wireless mesh network. A key outcome of this discussion is that, although the approach that has evolved is not ideal, it allows the reconciliation of conflicting demands for use of the shared network to reflect communal concerns; a property we believe is essential to its success, and that of user-provided networks. We argue that user-driven distributed arbitration of requests for resource is necessary in a user-provided network, and via a simple abstraction we discuss design options to enable this. The consequences of incorrect design decisions could negatively impact a network and its community of users. To help us make appropriate design decisions, we could look to scientific methods, such as game theory. However, we find them unable to model the intricacies of communal life, leading us to suggest it is necessary to stop considering users as anonymous rational persons and to start factoring in their personalities and beliefs.",
keywords = "challenges, communities, design , resource management , user-driven arbitration",
author = "Sara Bury and Johnathan Ishmael and Race, {Nicholas J.P.} and Mark Rouncefield and Paul Smith",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1145/1659029.1659035",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-60558-750-9 ",
series = "U-NET '09",
publisher = "ACM",
pages = "19--24",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on User-provided networking",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Reconciling community resource requirements in U-Nets

AU - Bury, Sara

AU - Ishmael, Johnathan

AU - Race, Nicholas J.P.

AU - Rouncefield, Mark

AU - Smith, Paul

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - A challenge for future user-provided networks will be reconciling potentially conflicting demands for a finite resource, such as network bandwidth. In this position paper, we discuss how this problem is tackled in an operational community-driven wireless mesh network. A key outcome of this discussion is that, although the approach that has evolved is not ideal, it allows the reconciliation of conflicting demands for use of the shared network to reflect communal concerns; a property we believe is essential to its success, and that of user-provided networks. We argue that user-driven distributed arbitration of requests for resource is necessary in a user-provided network, and via a simple abstraction we discuss design options to enable this. The consequences of incorrect design decisions could negatively impact a network and its community of users. To help us make appropriate design decisions, we could look to scientific methods, such as game theory. However, we find them unable to model the intricacies of communal life, leading us to suggest it is necessary to stop considering users as anonymous rational persons and to start factoring in their personalities and beliefs.

AB - A challenge for future user-provided networks will be reconciling potentially conflicting demands for a finite resource, such as network bandwidth. In this position paper, we discuss how this problem is tackled in an operational community-driven wireless mesh network. A key outcome of this discussion is that, although the approach that has evolved is not ideal, it allows the reconciliation of conflicting demands for use of the shared network to reflect communal concerns; a property we believe is essential to its success, and that of user-provided networks. We argue that user-driven distributed arbitration of requests for resource is necessary in a user-provided network, and via a simple abstraction we discuss design options to enable this. The consequences of incorrect design decisions could negatively impact a network and its community of users. To help us make appropriate design decisions, we could look to scientific methods, such as game theory. However, we find them unable to model the intricacies of communal life, leading us to suggest it is necessary to stop considering users as anonymous rational persons and to start factoring in their personalities and beliefs.

KW - challenges

KW - communities

KW - design

KW - resource management

KW - user-driven arbitration

U2 - 10.1145/1659029.1659035

DO - 10.1145/1659029.1659035

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 978-1-60558-750-9

T3 - U-NET '09

SP - 19

EP - 24

BT - Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on User-provided networking

PB - ACM

CY - New York, NY, USA

ER -