Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reconfiguring ruins

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Reconfiguring ruins: Beyond Ruinenlust

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Reconfiguring ruins : Beyond Ruinenlust. / Lopez-Galviz, Carlos Andres; Bartolini, Nadia; Pendleton, Mark; Stock, Adam.

In: GeoHumanities, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2017, p. 531-553.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Lopez-Galviz, CA, Bartolini, N, Pendleton, M & Stock, A 2017, 'Reconfiguring ruins: Beyond Ruinenlust', GeoHumanities, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 531-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2017.1374874

APA

Lopez-Galviz, C. A., Bartolini, N., Pendleton, M., & Stock, A. (2017). Reconfiguring ruins: Beyond Ruinenlust. GeoHumanities, 3(2), 531-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2017.1374874

Vancouver

Lopez-Galviz CA, Bartolini N, Pendleton M, Stock A. Reconfiguring ruins: Beyond Ruinenlust. GeoHumanities. 2017;3(2):531-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2017.1374874

Author

Lopez-Galviz, Carlos Andres ; Bartolini, Nadia ; Pendleton, Mark ; Stock, Adam. / Reconfiguring ruins : Beyond Ruinenlust. In: GeoHumanities. 2017 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 531-553.

Bibtex

@article{ebd778c572cd4d098c3fe5589481c4f7,
title = "Reconfiguring ruins: Beyond Ruinenlust",
abstract = "What explains the global proliferation of interest in ruins? Can ruins be understood beyond their common framing as products of European Romanticism? Might a transdisciplinary approach allow us to see ruins differently? These questions underpinned the AHRC-funded project Re-configuring Ruins, which deployed approaches from history, literature, East Asian Studies, and geography to reflect on how ruins from different historical contexts are understood by reference to different theoretical frameworks. In recognition of the value of learning from other models of knowledge production, the project also involved a successful collaboration with the Museum of London Archaeology and the artist-led community The NewBridge Project in Newcastle. By bringing these varied sets of knowledges to bear on the project{\textquoteright}s excavations of specific sites in the UK, the United States and Japan, the article argues for an understanding of ruins as thresholds, with ruin sites providing unique insights into the relationship between lived pasts, presents and futures. It does so by developing three key themes which reflect on the process of working collaboratively across the arts, humanities, and social sciences, including professional archaeology: Inter- and trans-disciplinarity, the limits of co-creation, and travelling meanings and praxis. Meanings of specific ruins are constructed out of specific languages and cultural resonances and read though different disciplines, but can also be reconfigured through concepts and practices that travel beyond disciplinary, cultural and linguistic borders. As we show here, the ruin is, and should be, a relational concept that moves beyond the Romantic notion of Ruinenlust. ",
keywords = "ruins, Ruinenlust, art, Interdisciplinarity, co-creation",
author = "Lopez-Galviz, {Carlos Andres} and Nadia Bartolini and Mark Pendleton and Adam Stock",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/2373566X.2017.1374874",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "531--553",
journal = "GeoHumanities",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconfiguring ruins

T2 - Beyond Ruinenlust

AU - Lopez-Galviz, Carlos Andres

AU - Bartolini, Nadia

AU - Pendleton, Mark

AU - Stock, Adam

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - What explains the global proliferation of interest in ruins? Can ruins be understood beyond their common framing as products of European Romanticism? Might a transdisciplinary approach allow us to see ruins differently? These questions underpinned the AHRC-funded project Re-configuring Ruins, which deployed approaches from history, literature, East Asian Studies, and geography to reflect on how ruins from different historical contexts are understood by reference to different theoretical frameworks. In recognition of the value of learning from other models of knowledge production, the project also involved a successful collaboration with the Museum of London Archaeology and the artist-led community The NewBridge Project in Newcastle. By bringing these varied sets of knowledges to bear on the project’s excavations of specific sites in the UK, the United States and Japan, the article argues for an understanding of ruins as thresholds, with ruin sites providing unique insights into the relationship between lived pasts, presents and futures. It does so by developing three key themes which reflect on the process of working collaboratively across the arts, humanities, and social sciences, including professional archaeology: Inter- and trans-disciplinarity, the limits of co-creation, and travelling meanings and praxis. Meanings of specific ruins are constructed out of specific languages and cultural resonances and read though different disciplines, but can also be reconfigured through concepts and practices that travel beyond disciplinary, cultural and linguistic borders. As we show here, the ruin is, and should be, a relational concept that moves beyond the Romantic notion of Ruinenlust.

AB - What explains the global proliferation of interest in ruins? Can ruins be understood beyond their common framing as products of European Romanticism? Might a transdisciplinary approach allow us to see ruins differently? These questions underpinned the AHRC-funded project Re-configuring Ruins, which deployed approaches from history, literature, East Asian Studies, and geography to reflect on how ruins from different historical contexts are understood by reference to different theoretical frameworks. In recognition of the value of learning from other models of knowledge production, the project also involved a successful collaboration with the Museum of London Archaeology and the artist-led community The NewBridge Project in Newcastle. By bringing these varied sets of knowledges to bear on the project’s excavations of specific sites in the UK, the United States and Japan, the article argues for an understanding of ruins as thresholds, with ruin sites providing unique insights into the relationship between lived pasts, presents and futures. It does so by developing three key themes which reflect on the process of working collaboratively across the arts, humanities, and social sciences, including professional archaeology: Inter- and trans-disciplinarity, the limits of co-creation, and travelling meanings and praxis. Meanings of specific ruins are constructed out of specific languages and cultural resonances and read though different disciplines, but can also be reconfigured through concepts and practices that travel beyond disciplinary, cultural and linguistic borders. As we show here, the ruin is, and should be, a relational concept that moves beyond the Romantic notion of Ruinenlust.

KW - ruins

KW - Ruinenlust

KW - art

KW - Interdisciplinarity

KW - co-creation

U2 - 10.1080/2373566X.2017.1374874

DO - 10.1080/2373566X.2017.1374874

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 531

EP - 553

JO - GeoHumanities

JF - GeoHumanities

IS - 2

ER -