Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluat...

Research

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluation Collaboratory

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper › peer-review

Published

Standard

Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluation Collaboratory. / Edwards, Gareth; Watton, Emma Louisa; Palmer, Adam.
2017.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper › peer-review

Harvard

Edwards, G, Watton, EL & Palmer, A 2017, 'Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluation Collaboratory'.

APA

Edwards, G., Watton, E. L., & Palmer, A. (2017). Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluation Collaboratory.

Vancouver

Edwards G, Watton EL, Palmer A. Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluation Collaboratory. 2017.

Author

Edwards, Gareth ; Watton, Emma Louisa ; Palmer, Adam. / Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluation Collaboratory.

Bibtex

@conference{5e18662ba2844bb4aa8f0df8411d542e,
title = "Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluation Collaboratory",
abstract = "In this paper we draw on work already being carried out linking ideas of collaboratory (Muff, 2014; Wulf, 1993) and leadership development (see Kempster and colleagues, forthcoming). Kempster and colleagues describe a collaboratory as a workshop to share insights, results and progress. They draw on the definition of a collaboratory from Wulf (1993: 19), which suggests that it is a:{\textquoteleft}… center without walls, in which a nation{\textquoteright}s researchers can perform their research without regard to physical location, interacting with colleagues, accessing instrumentation, sharing data and computational resources… accessing information from digital libraries.{\textquoteright}From Wulf{\textquoteright}s work Kempster and colleagues emphasise that a collaboratory should not be a one-off workshop but a process and should be interdisciplinary in nature; a collective action research project. We therefore investigate some of these issues in a collaboratory set up to consider different approaches to evaluating leadership development. ",
author = "Gareth Edwards and Watton, {Emma Louisa} and Adam Palmer",
year = "2017",
month = jul,
day = "14",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Reflections on a Leadership Development Evaluation Collaboratory

AU - Edwards, Gareth

AU - Watton, Emma Louisa

AU - Palmer, Adam

PY - 2017/7/14

Y1 - 2017/7/14

N2 - In this paper we draw on work already being carried out linking ideas of collaboratory (Muff, 2014; Wulf, 1993) and leadership development (see Kempster and colleagues, forthcoming). Kempster and colleagues describe a collaboratory as a workshop to share insights, results and progress. They draw on the definition of a collaboratory from Wulf (1993: 19), which suggests that it is a:‘… center without walls, in which a nation’s researchers can perform their research without regard to physical location, interacting with colleagues, accessing instrumentation, sharing data and computational resources… accessing information from digital libraries.’From Wulf’s work Kempster and colleagues emphasise that a collaboratory should not be a one-off workshop but a process and should be interdisciplinary in nature; a collective action research project. We therefore investigate some of these issues in a collaboratory set up to consider different approaches to evaluating leadership development.

AB - In this paper we draw on work already being carried out linking ideas of collaboratory (Muff, 2014; Wulf, 1993) and leadership development (see Kempster and colleagues, forthcoming). Kempster and colleagues describe a collaboratory as a workshop to share insights, results and progress. They draw on the definition of a collaboratory from Wulf (1993: 19), which suggests that it is a:‘… center without walls, in which a nation’s researchers can perform their research without regard to physical location, interacting with colleagues, accessing instrumentation, sharing data and computational resources… accessing information from digital libraries.’From Wulf’s work Kempster and colleagues emphasise that a collaboratory should not be a one-off workshop but a process and should be interdisciplinary in nature; a collective action research project. We therefore investigate some of these issues in a collaboratory set up to consider different approaches to evaluating leadership development.

M3 - Conference paper

ER -