Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • Michael O'Donnell
  • Leif D Nelson
  • Evi Ackermann
  • Balazs Aczel
  • Athfah Akhtar
  • Silvio Aldrovandi
  • Nasseem Alshaif
  • Ronald Andringa
  • Mark Aveyard
  • Peter Babincak
  • Nursena Balatekin
  • Scott A Baldwin
  • Gabriel Banik
  • Ernest Baskin
  • Raoul Bell
  • Olga Białobrzeska
  • Angie R Birt
  • Walter R Boot
  • Jessie C Briggs
  • Axel Buchner
  • Desiree Budd
  • Kathryn Budzik
  • Lottie Bullens
  • Richard L Bulley
  • Peter R Cannon
  • Katarzyna Cantarero
  • Joseph Cesario
  • Stephanie Chambers
  • Christopher R Chartier
  • Peggy Chekroun
  • Clara Chong
  • Axel Cleeremans
  • Sean P Coary
  • Jacob Coulthard
  • Florien M Cramwinckel
  • Thomas F Denson
  • Marcos Díaz-Lago
  • Theresa E DiDonato
  • Aaron Drummond
  • Julia Eberlen
  • Titus Ebersbach
  • John E Edlund
  • Katherine M Finnigan
  • Justin Fisher
  • Natalia Frankowska
  • Efraín García-Sánchez
  • Frank D Golom
  • Andrew J Graves
  • Kevin Greenberg
  • Mando Hanioti
  • Heather A Hansen
  • Jenna A Harder
  • Erin R Harrell
  • Andree Hartanto
  • Michael Inzlicht
  • Andrew Karpinski
  • Victor N Keller
  • Olivier Klein
  • Lina Koppel
  • Emiel Krahmer
  • Anthony Lantian
  • Michael J Larson
  • Jean-Baptiste Légal
  • Richard E Lucas
  • Corey M Magaldino
  • Karlijn Massar
  • Matthew T McBee
  • Nadhilla Melia
  • Michael C Mensink
  • Laura Mieth
  • Samantha Moore-Berg
  • Geraldine Neeser
  • Ben R Newell
  • Marret K Noordewier
  • Asil Ali Özdogğru
  • Myrto Pantazi
  • Michał Parzuchowski
  • Kim Peters
  • Michael C Philipp
  • Monique M H Pollmann
  • Panagiotis Rentzelas
  • Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
  • Jan Philipp Röer
  • Ivan Ropovik
  • Nelson A Roque
  • Carolina Rueda
  • Bastiaan T Rutjens
  • Katey Sackett
  • Janos Salamon
  • Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez
  • Blair Saunders
  • Juliette Schaafsma
  • Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck
  • David R Shanks
  • Martin F Sherman
  • Kenneth M Steele
  • Niklas K Steffens
  • Jessie Sun
  • Kyle J Susa
  • Barnabas Szaszi
  • Aba Szollosi
  • Ricardo M Tamayo
  • Gustav Tinghög
  • Yuk-Yue Tong
  • Carol Tweten
  • Miguel A Vadillo
  • Deisy Valcarcel
  • Nicolas Van der Linden
  • Michiel van Elk
  • Frenk van Harreveld
  • Daniel Västfjäll
  • Simine Vazire
  • Philippe Verduyn
  • Matt N Williams
  • Guillermo B Willis
  • Sarah E Wood
  • Chunliang Yang
  • Oulmann Zerhouni
  • Robert Zheng
  • Mark Zrubka
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/03/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Perspectives on Psychological Science
Issue number2
Volume13
Number of pages27
Pages (from-to)268-294
Publication statusPublished
Early online date21/02/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998) reported that participants primed with an intelligent category (“professor”) subsequently performed 13.2% better on a trivia test than participants primed with an unintelligent category (“soccer hooligans”). Two unpublished replications of this study by the original authors, designed to verify the appropriate testing procedures, observed a smaller difference between conditions (2-3%) as well as a gender difference: men showed the effect (9.3% and 7.6%) but women did not (0.3% and -0.3%). The procedure used in those replications served as the basis for this multi-lab Registered Replication Report (RRR). A total of 40 laboratories collected data for this project, with 23 laboratories meeting all inclusion criteria. Here we report the meta-analytic result of those 23 direct replications (total N = 4,493) of the updated version of the original study, examining the difference between priming with professor and hooligan on a 30-item general knowledge trivia task (a supplementary analysis reports results with all 40 labs). We observed no overall difference in trivia performance between participants primed with professor and those primed with hooligan (0.14%) and no moderation by gender.