Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Relational ontologies and the ground of life

Research

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

  • RelatOntologiesFINAL

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Dialogues in Human Geography, 6 (1), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Dialogues in Human Geography page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/dhg on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 98.5 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Relational ontologies and the ground of life

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Book/Film/Article review › peer-review

Published

Standard

Relational ontologies and the ground of life. / Clark, Nigel Halcomb.
In: Dialogues in Human Geography, Vol. 6, No. 1, 16.03.2016, p. 103-105.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Book/Film/Article review › peer-review

Harvard

Clark, NH 2016, 'Relational ontologies and the ground of life', Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 103-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820615616042

APA

Clark, N. H. (2016). Relational ontologies and the ground of life. Dialogues in Human Geography, 6(1), 103-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820615616042

Vancouver

Clark NH. Relational ontologies and the ground of life. Dialogues in Human Geography. 2016 Mar 16;6(1):103-105. doi: 10.1177/2043820615616042

Author

Clark, Nigel Halcomb. / Relational ontologies and the ground of life. In: Dialogues in Human Geography. 2016 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 103-105.

Bibtex

@article{702ea53c48a145ed9f4075e2baaf8cb7,
title = "Relational ontologies and the ground of life",
abstract = "This commentary on Irus Braverman{\textquoteright}s Wild Life (2015) and Jamie Lorimer{\textquoteright}s Wildlife in the Anthropocene (2015), raises some questions about the movement between the authors{\textquoteright} own relational ontologies and the pragmatic or improvised ontologies that surface in their respective ethnographic accounts. It also asks whether an apparent allegiance to an undefiled `Nature{\textquoteright} on the part of some conservationists might be viewed not only in terms of relational networks but also as kind of ontological commitment to the `ground{\textquoteright} of life. ",
keywords = "Wild life, conservation, ontology, relational materialism, Anthropocene",
author = "Clark, {Nigel Halcomb}",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Dialogues in Human Geography, 6 (1), 2017, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Dialogues in Human Geography page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/dhg on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1177/2043820615616042",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "103--105",
journal = "Dialogues in Human Geography",
issn = "2043-8206",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relational ontologies and the ground of life

AU - Clark, Nigel Halcomb

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Dialogues in Human Geography, 6 (1), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Dialogues in Human Geography page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/dhg on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

PY - 2016/3/16

Y1 - 2016/3/16

N2 - This commentary on Irus Braverman’s Wild Life (2015) and Jamie Lorimer’s Wildlife in the Anthropocene (2015), raises some questions about the movement between the authors’ own relational ontologies and the pragmatic or improvised ontologies that surface in their respective ethnographic accounts. It also asks whether an apparent allegiance to an undefiled `Nature’ on the part of some conservationists might be viewed not only in terms of relational networks but also as kind of ontological commitment to the `ground’ of life.

AB - This commentary on Irus Braverman’s Wild Life (2015) and Jamie Lorimer’s Wildlife in the Anthropocene (2015), raises some questions about the movement between the authors’ own relational ontologies and the pragmatic or improvised ontologies that surface in their respective ethnographic accounts. It also asks whether an apparent allegiance to an undefiled `Nature’ on the part of some conservationists might be viewed not only in terms of relational networks but also as kind of ontological commitment to the `ground’ of life.

KW - Wild life

KW - conservation

KW - ontology

KW - relational materialism

KW - Anthropocene

U2 - 10.1177/2043820615616042

DO - 10.1177/2043820615616042

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

VL - 6

SP - 103

EP - 105

JO - Dialogues in Human Geography

JF - Dialogues in Human Geography

SN - 2043-8206

IS - 1

ER -