Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reliability and variability of sleep and activi...
View graph of relations

Reliability and variability of sleep and activity as biomarkers of ageing in Drosophila

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Reliability and variability of sleep and activity as biomarkers of ageing in Drosophila. / Koudounas, Sofocles; Green, Edward W.; Clancy, David.

In: Biogerontology, Vol. 13, No. 5, 10.2012, p. 489-499.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Koudounas, Sofocles ; Green, Edward W. ; Clancy, David. / Reliability and variability of sleep and activity as biomarkers of ageing in Drosophila. In: Biogerontology. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. 489-499.

Bibtex

@article{0f631c5c86f4404ebceb69daf937ab64,
title = "Reliability and variability of sleep and activity as biomarkers of ageing in Drosophila",
abstract = "There are currently no reliable biomarkers of ageing. A biomarker should indicate biological age, that is, the amount of an animal's total lifespan it has lived and, therefore, the amount of time it has remaining. Some potential biomarkers cannot be validated as their measurement involves harm or death of the animal, such that its ultimate lifespan cannot be determined. A non-destructive biomarker would allow us to test molecular markers potentially involved directly in the ageing process, to monitor the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions to delay ageing, and provide a useful measure of general health of the organism. In the model organism Drosophila, various behavioural phenotypes change directionally with age, but we do not know whether they predict lifespan. Here we measure activity and sleep parameters in 64 wild type male flies from two recently wild-caught populations over the course of their natural lives, and determine whether such measures may predict biological age and ultimate lifespan. Indices of sleep fragmentation and circadian rhythm were the best predictors of lifespan, though population differences were evident. However, when used to predict a biological age of 50 % lifespan elapsed our best behavioural measure was slightly less accurate and less precise compared with using chronological age as predictor.",
keywords = "Biomarker, Sleep , Activity , Drosophila , Aging , Lifespan",
author = "Sofocles Koudounas and Green, {Edward W.} and David Clancy",
year = "2012",
month = oct
doi = "10.1007/s10522-012-9393-4",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "489--499",
journal = "Biogerontology",
issn = "1389-5729",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and variability of sleep and activity as biomarkers of ageing in Drosophila

AU - Koudounas, Sofocles

AU - Green, Edward W.

AU - Clancy, David

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - There are currently no reliable biomarkers of ageing. A biomarker should indicate biological age, that is, the amount of an animal's total lifespan it has lived and, therefore, the amount of time it has remaining. Some potential biomarkers cannot be validated as their measurement involves harm or death of the animal, such that its ultimate lifespan cannot be determined. A non-destructive biomarker would allow us to test molecular markers potentially involved directly in the ageing process, to monitor the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions to delay ageing, and provide a useful measure of general health of the organism. In the model organism Drosophila, various behavioural phenotypes change directionally with age, but we do not know whether they predict lifespan. Here we measure activity and sleep parameters in 64 wild type male flies from two recently wild-caught populations over the course of their natural lives, and determine whether such measures may predict biological age and ultimate lifespan. Indices of sleep fragmentation and circadian rhythm were the best predictors of lifespan, though population differences were evident. However, when used to predict a biological age of 50 % lifespan elapsed our best behavioural measure was slightly less accurate and less precise compared with using chronological age as predictor.

AB - There are currently no reliable biomarkers of ageing. A biomarker should indicate biological age, that is, the amount of an animal's total lifespan it has lived and, therefore, the amount of time it has remaining. Some potential biomarkers cannot be validated as their measurement involves harm or death of the animal, such that its ultimate lifespan cannot be determined. A non-destructive biomarker would allow us to test molecular markers potentially involved directly in the ageing process, to monitor the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions to delay ageing, and provide a useful measure of general health of the organism. In the model organism Drosophila, various behavioural phenotypes change directionally with age, but we do not know whether they predict lifespan. Here we measure activity and sleep parameters in 64 wild type male flies from two recently wild-caught populations over the course of their natural lives, and determine whether such measures may predict biological age and ultimate lifespan. Indices of sleep fragmentation and circadian rhythm were the best predictors of lifespan, though population differences were evident. However, when used to predict a biological age of 50 % lifespan elapsed our best behavioural measure was slightly less accurate and less precise compared with using chronological age as predictor.

KW - Biomarker

KW - Sleep

KW - Activity

KW - Drosophila

KW - Aging

KW - Lifespan

U2 - 10.1007/s10522-012-9393-4

DO - 10.1007/s10522-012-9393-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 489

EP - 499

JO - Biogerontology

JF - Biogerontology

SN - 1389-5729

IS - 5

ER -