Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Environment and Planning A, ? (?), 2020, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2020 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Environment and Planning A page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/EPN on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 224 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Rentiership, 'improperty', and moral economy
AU - Sayer, Andrew
PY - 2023/9/30
Y1 - 2023/9/30
N2 - The rentier economy is not only dysfunctional but unjust. In this paper I use a moral economic approach to defend this proposition by going back to basic concepts. Drawing upon classical political economic theory and political theory, and the work of Hobson and Tawney and more recent theorists, I propose a set of complementary distinctions that deepen understanding of rentiership: earned and unearned income; wealth-creating and wealth-extracting investment; property and improperty. I then comment on the relations, similarities and differences between capitalists and rentiers. Next I review the changing relation between critiques of rentiership and notions of ‘free markets’ and ‘property-owning democracy’ in the history of capitalism, with particular emphasis on the relation of neoliberalism to rent-seeking. Finally, I briefly discuss the implications of rentiership for reducing inequality and averting global heating.
AB - The rentier economy is not only dysfunctional but unjust. In this paper I use a moral economic approach to defend this proposition by going back to basic concepts. Drawing upon classical political economic theory and political theory, and the work of Hobson and Tawney and more recent theorists, I propose a set of complementary distinctions that deepen understanding of rentiership: earned and unearned income; wealth-creating and wealth-extracting investment; property and improperty. I then comment on the relations, similarities and differences between capitalists and rentiers. Next I review the changing relation between critiques of rentiership and notions of ‘free markets’ and ‘property-owning democracy’ in the history of capitalism, with particular emphasis on the relation of neoliberalism to rent-seeking. Finally, I briefly discuss the implications of rentiership for reducing inequality and averting global heating.
KW - rentier
KW - improperty
KW - unearned income
KW - investment
KW - politics
KW - property-owning democracy
KW - Improperty
KW - moral economy
KW - rentiership
U2 - 10.1177/0308518X20908287
DO - 10.1177/0308518X20908287
M3 - Journal article
VL - 55
SP - 1471
EP - 1484
JO - Environment and Planning A
JF - Environment and Planning A
SN - 0308-518X
IS - 6
ER -