Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01257-7
Accepted author manuscript, 732 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeated measures regression mixture models
AU - Kim, M.
AU - Van Horn, M.L.
AU - Jaki, T.
AU - Vermunt, J.
AU - Feaster, D.
AU - Lichstein, K.L.
AU - Taylor, D.J.
AU - Riedel, B.W.
AU - Bush, A.J.
N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01257-7
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Regression mixture models are one increasingly utilized approach for developing theories about and exploring the heterogeneity of effects. In this study we aimed to extend the current use of regression mixtures to a repeated regression mixture method when repeated measures, such as diary-type and experience-sampling method, data are available. We hypothesized that additional information borrowed from the repeated measures would improve the model performance, in terms of class enumeration and accuracy of the parameter estimates. We specifically compared three types of model specifications in regression mixtures: (a) traditional single-outcome model; (b) repeated measures models with three, five, and seven measures; and (c) a single-outcome model with the average of seven repeated measures. The results showed that the repeated measures regression mixture models substantially outperformed the traditional and average single-outcome models in class enumeration, with less bias in the parameter estimates. For sample size, whereas prior recommendations have suggested that regression mixtures require samples of well over 1,000 participants, even for classes at a large distance from each other (classes with regression weights of.20 vs.70), the present repeated measures regression mixture models allow for samples as low as 200 participants with an increased number (i.e., seven) of repeated measures. We also demonstrate an application of the proposed repeated measures approach using data from the Sleep Research Project. Implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
AB - Regression mixture models are one increasingly utilized approach for developing theories about and exploring the heterogeneity of effects. In this study we aimed to extend the current use of regression mixtures to a repeated regression mixture method when repeated measures, such as diary-type and experience-sampling method, data are available. We hypothesized that additional information borrowed from the repeated measures would improve the model performance, in terms of class enumeration and accuracy of the parameter estimates. We specifically compared three types of model specifications in regression mixtures: (a) traditional single-outcome model; (b) repeated measures models with three, five, and seven measures; and (c) a single-outcome model with the average of seven repeated measures. The results showed that the repeated measures regression mixture models substantially outperformed the traditional and average single-outcome models in class enumeration, with less bias in the parameter estimates. For sample size, whereas prior recommendations have suggested that regression mixtures require samples of well over 1,000 participants, even for classes at a large distance from each other (classes with regression weights of.20 vs.70), the present repeated measures regression mixture models allow for samples as low as 200 participants with an increased number (i.e., seven) of repeated measures. We also demonstrate an application of the proposed repeated measures approach using data from the Sleep Research Project. Implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
KW - Heterogeneous effects
KW - Regression mixture models
KW - Repeated measures
KW - Sample size
KW - adult
KW - article
KW - female
KW - human
KW - human experiment
KW - human tissue
KW - major clinical study
KW - male
KW - remission
KW - sample size
KW - sleep
U2 - 10.3758/s13428-019-01257-7
DO - 10.3758/s13428-019-01257-7
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31152385
VL - 52
SP - 591
EP - 606
JO - Behavior Research Methods
JF - Behavior Research Methods
SN - 1554-351X
IS - 2
ER -