Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Representing children's views and best interest...
View graph of relations

Representing children's views and best interests in court : an international comparison.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Representing children's views and best interests in court : an international comparison. / Bilson, Andy; White, Susan.
In: Child Abuse Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 07.2005, p. 220-239.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bilson A, White S. Representing children's views and best interests in court : an international comparison. Child Abuse Review. 2005 Jul;14(4):220-239. doi: 10.1002/car.902

Author

Bilson, Andy ; White, Susan. / Representing children's views and best interests in court : an international comparison. In: Child Abuse Review. 2005 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 220-239.

Bibtex

@article{776cf1b329504fc1b4c45aebdf13c3c5,
title = "Representing children's views and best interests in court : an international comparison.",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparison of a number of alternative models of international practice in relation to the appointment and organization of guardians ad litem and other children's representatives in child care and family proceedings. The paper notes that, in their attempts to address the need for children to have representation in matters affecting their welfare, English-speaking countries have tended to conflate the two salient Articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, that is, Article 3, which deals with the child's best interests, and Article 12, which deals with their right to express their wishes and feelings. Where systems other than stand alone legal representation have been put in place, the child's representative is charged with both assessing their best interests and, often as a secondary duty, communicating their views. The paper concludes that for some groups of children in public or private law proceedings, an advocate (rather than a best interest oriented guardian, and where necessary in addition to a legal representative) may enable better representation of the child in the courts and greater participation by children in legal proceedings, an increased role for children as citizens and a fuller implementation of their rights.",
keywords = "guardian ad litem • children's representation • children's voice • children's rights • courts",
author = "Andy Bilson and Susan White",
year = "2005",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1002/car.902",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "220--239",
journal = "Child Abuse Review",
issn = "0952-9136",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representing children's views and best interests in court : an international comparison.

AU - Bilson, Andy

AU - White, Susan

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - This paper provides a comparison of a number of alternative models of international practice in relation to the appointment and organization of guardians ad litem and other children's representatives in child care and family proceedings. The paper notes that, in their attempts to address the need for children to have representation in matters affecting their welfare, English-speaking countries have tended to conflate the two salient Articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, that is, Article 3, which deals with the child's best interests, and Article 12, which deals with their right to express their wishes and feelings. Where systems other than stand alone legal representation have been put in place, the child's representative is charged with both assessing their best interests and, often as a secondary duty, communicating their views. The paper concludes that for some groups of children in public or private law proceedings, an advocate (rather than a best interest oriented guardian, and where necessary in addition to a legal representative) may enable better representation of the child in the courts and greater participation by children in legal proceedings, an increased role for children as citizens and a fuller implementation of their rights.

AB - This paper provides a comparison of a number of alternative models of international practice in relation to the appointment and organization of guardians ad litem and other children's representatives in child care and family proceedings. The paper notes that, in their attempts to address the need for children to have representation in matters affecting their welfare, English-speaking countries have tended to conflate the two salient Articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, that is, Article 3, which deals with the child's best interests, and Article 12, which deals with their right to express their wishes and feelings. Where systems other than stand alone legal representation have been put in place, the child's representative is charged with both assessing their best interests and, often as a secondary duty, communicating their views. The paper concludes that for some groups of children in public or private law proceedings, an advocate (rather than a best interest oriented guardian, and where necessary in addition to a legal representative) may enable better representation of the child in the courts and greater participation by children in legal proceedings, an increased role for children as citizens and a fuller implementation of their rights.

KW - guardian ad litem • children's representation • children's voice • children's rights • courts

U2 - 10.1002/car.902

DO - 10.1002/car.902

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 220

EP - 239

JO - Child Abuse Review

JF - Child Abuse Review

SN - 0952-9136

IS - 4

ER -