Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Chan...
View graph of relations

Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. / Shackley, Simon; Wynne, Brian.

In: Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1996, p. 275-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Shackley, Simon ; Wynne, Brian. / Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. In: Science, Technology, and Human Values. 1996 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 275-302.

Bibtex

@article{8f9f9dea511a4787a51ddc6300edfd11,
title = "Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority.",
abstract = "This article argues that, in public and policy contexts, the ways in which many scientists talk about uncertainty in simulations of future climate change not only facilitates communications and cooperation between scientific and policy communities but also affects the perceived authority of science. Uncertainty tends to challenge the authority of chmate science, especially if it is used for policy making, but the relationship between authority and uncertainty is not simply an inverse one. In policy contexts, many scientists are compelled to talk about uncertainty but do not wish to imply that uncertainty is a serious challenge to the authority of scientific knowledge or to its substantial use in policy making. {"}Boundary-ordering devices, {"} the contextual discursive attempts to reconcile uncertainty and authority in science, depend critically for their success on their {"}dual{"} interpretation: at a general level across a boundary and differently on either side of it. The authors empirically identify a range of such boundary-ordering devices in the climate field.",
author = "Simon Shackley and Brian Wynne",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1177/016224399602100302",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "275--302",
journal = "Science, Technology, and Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority.

AU - Shackley, Simon

AU - Wynne, Brian

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - This article argues that, in public and policy contexts, the ways in which many scientists talk about uncertainty in simulations of future climate change not only facilitates communications and cooperation between scientific and policy communities but also affects the perceived authority of science. Uncertainty tends to challenge the authority of chmate science, especially if it is used for policy making, but the relationship between authority and uncertainty is not simply an inverse one. In policy contexts, many scientists are compelled to talk about uncertainty but do not wish to imply that uncertainty is a serious challenge to the authority of scientific knowledge or to its substantial use in policy making. "Boundary-ordering devices, " the contextual discursive attempts to reconcile uncertainty and authority in science, depend critically for their success on their "dual" interpretation: at a general level across a boundary and differently on either side of it. The authors empirically identify a range of such boundary-ordering devices in the climate field.

AB - This article argues that, in public and policy contexts, the ways in which many scientists talk about uncertainty in simulations of future climate change not only facilitates communications and cooperation between scientific and policy communities but also affects the perceived authority of science. Uncertainty tends to challenge the authority of chmate science, especially if it is used for policy making, but the relationship between authority and uncertainty is not simply an inverse one. In policy contexts, many scientists are compelled to talk about uncertainty but do not wish to imply that uncertainty is a serious challenge to the authority of scientific knowledge or to its substantial use in policy making. "Boundary-ordering devices, " the contextual discursive attempts to reconcile uncertainty and authority in science, depend critically for their success on their "dual" interpretation: at a general level across a boundary and differently on either side of it. The authors empirically identify a range of such boundary-ordering devices in the climate field.

U2 - 10.1177/016224399602100302

DO - 10.1177/016224399602100302

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 275

EP - 302

JO - Science, Technology, and Human Values

JF - Science, Technology, and Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 3

ER -