Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Research directions in agent communication
View graph of relations

Research directions in agent communication

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Research directions in agent communication. / Chopra, Amit K.; Artikis, Alexander; Bentahar, Jamal et al.
In: ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 20, 03.2013, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Chopra, AK, Artikis, A, Bentahar, J, Colombetti, M, Dignum, F, Fornara, N, Jones, AJI, Singh, MP & Yolum, P 2013, 'Research directions in agent communication', ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, 20, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2438653.2438655

APA

Chopra, A. K., Artikis, A., Bentahar, J., Colombetti, M., Dignum, F., Fornara, N., Jones, A. J. I., Singh, M. P., & Yolum, P. (2013). Research directions in agent communication. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 4(2), 1-23. Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2438653.2438655

Vancouver

Chopra AK, Artikis A, Bentahar J, Colombetti M, Dignum F, Fornara N et al. Research directions in agent communication. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. 2013 Mar;4(2):1-23. 20. doi: 10.1145/2438653.2438655

Author

Chopra, Amit K. ; Artikis, Alexander ; Bentahar, Jamal et al. / Research directions in agent communication. In: ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. 2013 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 1-23.

Bibtex

@article{b523075539514c85a8b91cd1091102b2,
title = "Research directions in agent communication",
abstract = "Increasingly, software engineering involves open systems consisting of autonomous and heterogeneous participants or agents who carry out loosely coupled interactions. Accordingly, understanding and specifying communications among agents is a key concern. A focus on ways to formalize meaning distinguishes agent communication from traditional distributed computing: meaning provides a basis for flexible interactions and compliance checking.Over the years, a number of approaches have emerged with some essential and some irrelevant distinctions drawn among them. As agent abstractions gain increasing traction in the software engineering of open systems, it is important to resolve the irrelevant and highlight the essential distinctions, so that future research can be focused in the most productive directions.This article is an outcome of extensive discussions among agent communication researchers, aimed at taking stock of the field and at developing, criticizing, and refining their positions on specific approaches and future challenges. This article serves some important purposes, including identifying (1) points of broad consensus; (2) points where substantive differences remain; and (3) interesting directions of future work.",
author = "Chopra, {Amit K.} and Alexander Artikis and Jamal Bentahar and Marco Colombetti and Frank Dignum and Nicoletta Fornara and Jones, {Andrew J. I.} and Singh, {Munindar P.} and Pinar Yolum",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1145/2438653.2438655",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology",
issn = "2157-6904",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery, Inc",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research directions in agent communication

AU - Chopra, Amit K.

AU - Artikis, Alexander

AU - Bentahar, Jamal

AU - Colombetti, Marco

AU - Dignum, Frank

AU - Fornara, Nicoletta

AU - Jones, Andrew J. I.

AU - Singh, Munindar P.

AU - Yolum, Pinar

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Increasingly, software engineering involves open systems consisting of autonomous and heterogeneous participants or agents who carry out loosely coupled interactions. Accordingly, understanding and specifying communications among agents is a key concern. A focus on ways to formalize meaning distinguishes agent communication from traditional distributed computing: meaning provides a basis for flexible interactions and compliance checking.Over the years, a number of approaches have emerged with some essential and some irrelevant distinctions drawn among them. As agent abstractions gain increasing traction in the software engineering of open systems, it is important to resolve the irrelevant and highlight the essential distinctions, so that future research can be focused in the most productive directions.This article is an outcome of extensive discussions among agent communication researchers, aimed at taking stock of the field and at developing, criticizing, and refining their positions on specific approaches and future challenges. This article serves some important purposes, including identifying (1) points of broad consensus; (2) points where substantive differences remain; and (3) interesting directions of future work.

AB - Increasingly, software engineering involves open systems consisting of autonomous and heterogeneous participants or agents who carry out loosely coupled interactions. Accordingly, understanding and specifying communications among agents is a key concern. A focus on ways to formalize meaning distinguishes agent communication from traditional distributed computing: meaning provides a basis for flexible interactions and compliance checking.Over the years, a number of approaches have emerged with some essential and some irrelevant distinctions drawn among them. As agent abstractions gain increasing traction in the software engineering of open systems, it is important to resolve the irrelevant and highlight the essential distinctions, so that future research can be focused in the most productive directions.This article is an outcome of extensive discussions among agent communication researchers, aimed at taking stock of the field and at developing, criticizing, and refining their positions on specific approaches and future challenges. This article serves some important purposes, including identifying (1) points of broad consensus; (2) points where substantive differences remain; and (3) interesting directions of future work.

U2 - 10.1145/2438653.2438655

DO - 10.1145/2438653.2438655

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

JF - ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

SN - 2157-6904

IS - 2

M1 - 20

ER -