Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reshaping what counts as care: older people, wo...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies. / Roberts, Celia; Mort, Margaret.
In: Alter: European Journal of Disability Research / Alter: Journal Européen de Recherche sur le Handicap, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2009, p. 138-158.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Roberts, C & Mort, M 2009, 'Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies', Alter: European Journal of Disability Research / Alter: Journal Européen de Recherche sur le Handicap, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.004

APA

Roberts, C., & Mort, M. (2009). Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies. Alter: European Journal of Disability Research / Alter: Journal Européen de Recherche sur le Handicap, 3(2), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.004

Vancouver

Roberts C, Mort M. Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies. Alter: European Journal of Disability Research / Alter: Journal Européen de Recherche sur le Handicap. 2009;3(2):138-158. doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.004

Author

Roberts, Celia ; Mort, Margaret. / Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies. In: Alter: European Journal of Disability Research / Alter: Journal Européen de Recherche sur le Handicap. 2009 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 138-158.

Bibtex

@article{677b2bcc8ccb41beb13436ace6f7f1d7,
title = "Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies",
abstract = "In governmental and technical discourses, telecare systems are described as a solution to the {\textquoteleft}problem{\textquoteright} of aging populations. This paper draws on an ongoing ethnography of the implementation of telecare in one county in England and asks how the promotion and implementation of telecare shapes understandings of what care means for frail older people living at home. We suggest that telecare discourses attempt to divide care work into three distinct domains of practice: monitoring, physical care and social–emotional care. Telecare, in this logic, deals only with monitoring and leaves the other elements untouched. This tripartite division of care, we argue, both diminishes the kinds of care (potentially) offered in telecare and fails to account for the complexities of all kinds of care (physical, social-emotional and telecare). Building on work from disability studies and feminist studies, we suggest that what counts as care needs to be rethought if telecare is to make a positive contribution to the lives of older people and those who care for and about them.",
keywords = "Telecare, care work, older people, home, disability studies, feminism",
author = "Celia Roberts and Margaret Mort",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.004",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "138--158",
journal = "Alter: European Journal of Disability Research / Alter: Journal Europ{\'e}en de Recherche sur le Handicap",
issn = "1875-0672",
publisher = "Elsevier Masson",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies

AU - Roberts, Celia

AU - Mort, Margaret

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In governmental and technical discourses, telecare systems are described as a solution to the ‘problem’ of aging populations. This paper draws on an ongoing ethnography of the implementation of telecare in one county in England and asks how the promotion and implementation of telecare shapes understandings of what care means for frail older people living at home. We suggest that telecare discourses attempt to divide care work into three distinct domains of practice: monitoring, physical care and social–emotional care. Telecare, in this logic, deals only with monitoring and leaves the other elements untouched. This tripartite division of care, we argue, both diminishes the kinds of care (potentially) offered in telecare and fails to account for the complexities of all kinds of care (physical, social-emotional and telecare). Building on work from disability studies and feminist studies, we suggest that what counts as care needs to be rethought if telecare is to make a positive contribution to the lives of older people and those who care for and about them.

AB - In governmental and technical discourses, telecare systems are described as a solution to the ‘problem’ of aging populations. This paper draws on an ongoing ethnography of the implementation of telecare in one county in England and asks how the promotion and implementation of telecare shapes understandings of what care means for frail older people living at home. We suggest that telecare discourses attempt to divide care work into three distinct domains of practice: monitoring, physical care and social–emotional care. Telecare, in this logic, deals only with monitoring and leaves the other elements untouched. This tripartite division of care, we argue, both diminishes the kinds of care (potentially) offered in telecare and fails to account for the complexities of all kinds of care (physical, social-emotional and telecare). Building on work from disability studies and feminist studies, we suggest that what counts as care needs to be rethought if telecare is to make a positive contribution to the lives of older people and those who care for and about them.

KW - Telecare

KW - care work

KW - older people

KW - home

KW - disability studies

KW - feminism

U2 - 10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 138

EP - 158

JO - Alter: European Journal of Disability Research / Alter: Journal Européen de Recherche sur le Handicap

JF - Alter: European Journal of Disability Research / Alter: Journal Européen de Recherche sur le Handicap

SN - 1875-0672

IS - 2

ER -