Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Response to Intervention as a Predictor of Long...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Response to Intervention as a Predictor of Long-Term Reading Outcomes in Children with Dyslexia: Predicting Long-Term Reading Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Response to Intervention as a Predictor of Long-Term Reading Outcomes in Children with Dyslexia: Predicting Long-Term Reading Outcomes. / Kleij, Sanne W. van der; Segers, Eliane; Groen, Margriet A. et al.
In: Annals of Dyslexia, Vol. 23, No. 3, 08.2017, p. 268-282.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kleij SWVD, Segers E, Groen MA, Verhoeven L. Response to Intervention as a Predictor of Long-Term Reading Outcomes in Children with Dyslexia: Predicting Long-Term Reading Outcomes. Annals of Dyslexia. 2017 Aug;23(3):268-282. Epub 2017 Jul 9. doi: 10.1002/dys.1562

Author

Kleij, Sanne W. van der ; Segers, Eliane ; Groen, Margriet A. et al. / Response to Intervention as a Predictor of Long-Term Reading Outcomes in Children with Dyslexia : Predicting Long-Term Reading Outcomes. In: Annals of Dyslexia. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 268-282.

Bibtex

@article{1bd7cb992d4a4746993825557cb4fee7,
title = "Response to Intervention as a Predictor of Long-Term Reading Outcomes in Children with Dyslexia: Predicting Long-Term Reading Outcomes",
abstract = "The goal of this study was to investigate how growth during a phonics‐based intervention, as well as reading levels at baseline testing, predicted long‐term reading outcomes of children with dyslexia. Eighty Dutch children with dyslexia who had completed a 50‐week phonics‐based intervention in grade 4 were tested in grade 5 on both word and pseudoword (following regular Dutch orthographic patterns) reading efficiency and compared to 93 typical readers. In grade 5 the children with dyslexia were still significantly slower in word and pseudoword reading than their typically developing peers. Results showed that long‐term pseudoword reading in the group with dyslexia was predicted by pseudoword reading at pretest and growth in pseudoword reading during the intervention, which was itself predicted by pseudoword reading at pretest. This was not the case for word reading. We found that long‐term word reading was directly predicted from pretest word reading, and indirectly via pretest pseudoword reading, via growth in pseudoword and word reading. It can be concluded that pseudoword reading is not only a good indicator of severity of reading difficulties in children with dyslexia, it is also an indicator of who will profit from intervention in the long‐term. ",
keywords = "dyslexia, intervention, long-term outcomes, decoding",
author = "Kleij, {Sanne W. van der} and Eliane Segers and Groen, {Margriet A.} and Ludo Verhoeven",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1002/dys.1562",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "268--282",
journal = "Annals of Dyslexia",
issn = "0736-9387",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Intervention as a Predictor of Long-Term Reading Outcomes in Children with Dyslexia

T2 - Predicting Long-Term Reading Outcomes

AU - Kleij, Sanne W. van der

AU - Segers, Eliane

AU - Groen, Margriet A.

AU - Verhoeven, Ludo

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - The goal of this study was to investigate how growth during a phonics‐based intervention, as well as reading levels at baseline testing, predicted long‐term reading outcomes of children with dyslexia. Eighty Dutch children with dyslexia who had completed a 50‐week phonics‐based intervention in grade 4 were tested in grade 5 on both word and pseudoword (following regular Dutch orthographic patterns) reading efficiency and compared to 93 typical readers. In grade 5 the children with dyslexia were still significantly slower in word and pseudoword reading than their typically developing peers. Results showed that long‐term pseudoword reading in the group with dyslexia was predicted by pseudoword reading at pretest and growth in pseudoword reading during the intervention, which was itself predicted by pseudoword reading at pretest. This was not the case for word reading. We found that long‐term word reading was directly predicted from pretest word reading, and indirectly via pretest pseudoword reading, via growth in pseudoword and word reading. It can be concluded that pseudoword reading is not only a good indicator of severity of reading difficulties in children with dyslexia, it is also an indicator of who will profit from intervention in the long‐term.

AB - The goal of this study was to investigate how growth during a phonics‐based intervention, as well as reading levels at baseline testing, predicted long‐term reading outcomes of children with dyslexia. Eighty Dutch children with dyslexia who had completed a 50‐week phonics‐based intervention in grade 4 were tested in grade 5 on both word and pseudoword (following regular Dutch orthographic patterns) reading efficiency and compared to 93 typical readers. In grade 5 the children with dyslexia were still significantly slower in word and pseudoword reading than their typically developing peers. Results showed that long‐term pseudoword reading in the group with dyslexia was predicted by pseudoword reading at pretest and growth in pseudoword reading during the intervention, which was itself predicted by pseudoword reading at pretest. This was not the case for word reading. We found that long‐term word reading was directly predicted from pretest word reading, and indirectly via pretest pseudoword reading, via growth in pseudoword and word reading. It can be concluded that pseudoword reading is not only a good indicator of severity of reading difficulties in children with dyslexia, it is also an indicator of who will profit from intervention in the long‐term.

KW - dyslexia

KW - intervention

KW - long-term outcomes

KW - decoding

U2 - 10.1002/dys.1562

DO - 10.1002/dys.1562

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 268

EP - 282

JO - Annals of Dyslexia

JF - Annals of Dyslexia

SN - 0736-9387

IS - 3

ER -