Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Responsibilities for Health Care
View graph of relations

Responsibilities for Health Care: Kantian Reflections

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Responsibilities for Health Care: Kantian Reflections. / Williams, Garrath; Chadwick, Ruth.
In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 155-165.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Williams, G & Chadwick, R 2012, 'Responsibilities for Health Care: Kantian Reflections', Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180111000661

APA

Williams, G., & Chadwick, R. (2012). Responsibilities for Health Care: Kantian Reflections. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 21(2), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180111000661

Vancouver

Williams G, Chadwick R. Responsibilities for Health Care: Kantian Reflections. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2012 Apr;21(2):155-165. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000661

Author

Williams, Garrath ; Chadwick, Ruth. / Responsibilities for Health Care : Kantian Reflections. In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2012 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 155-165.

Bibtex

@article{7efe28df53054323b836ea6e5721abf3,
title = "Responsibilities for Health Care: Kantian Reflections",
abstract = "This paper explores some ways in which Immanuel Kant{\textquoteright}s ethical theory can be brought to bear on professional and health care ethics. Health care professionals are not mere individuals acting upon their own ends. Rather, their principles of action must be defined in terms of participation in a cooperative endeavor. This generates complex questions as to how well their roles mesh with one another and whether they comprise a well-formed collective agent. We argue that Kant{\textquoteright}s ethics therefore, and perhaps surprisingly, requires us to consider the institutions, procedures, and politics that decide who should play what part in a complex collective enterprise. Likewise, professional responsibility involves – alongside a readiness to play one{\textquoteright}s individual part – a concern for these collective aspects of healthcare.",
author = "Garrath Williams and Ruth Chadwick",
year = "2012",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1017/S0963180111000661",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "155--165",
journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",
issn = "0963-1801",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsibilities for Health Care

T2 - Kantian Reflections

AU - Williams, Garrath

AU - Chadwick, Ruth

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - This paper explores some ways in which Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory can be brought to bear on professional and health care ethics. Health care professionals are not mere individuals acting upon their own ends. Rather, their principles of action must be defined in terms of participation in a cooperative endeavor. This generates complex questions as to how well their roles mesh with one another and whether they comprise a well-formed collective agent. We argue that Kant’s ethics therefore, and perhaps surprisingly, requires us to consider the institutions, procedures, and politics that decide who should play what part in a complex collective enterprise. Likewise, professional responsibility involves – alongside a readiness to play one’s individual part – a concern for these collective aspects of healthcare.

AB - This paper explores some ways in which Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory can be brought to bear on professional and health care ethics. Health care professionals are not mere individuals acting upon their own ends. Rather, their principles of action must be defined in terms of participation in a cooperative endeavor. This generates complex questions as to how well their roles mesh with one another and whether they comprise a well-formed collective agent. We argue that Kant’s ethics therefore, and perhaps surprisingly, requires us to consider the institutions, procedures, and politics that decide who should play what part in a complex collective enterprise. Likewise, professional responsibility involves – alongside a readiness to play one’s individual part – a concern for these collective aspects of healthcare.

U2 - 10.1017/S0963180111000661

DO - 10.1017/S0963180111000661

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 155

EP - 165

JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

SN - 0963-1801

IS - 2

ER -