Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Responsibility, emergency, blame

Electronic data

  • Follis Responsibility Accepted Manuscript

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Human Rights, 14 (1), 2015, © Informa Plc

    Accepted author manuscript, 198 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Responsibility, emergency, blame: reporting on migrant deaths on the Mediterranean in the Council of Europe

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Responsibility, emergency, blame: reporting on migrant deaths on the Mediterranean in the Council of Europe. / Follis, Karolina.
In: Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 14, No. 1, 23.01.2015, p. 41-62.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Follis K. Responsibility, emergency, blame: reporting on migrant deaths on the Mediterranean in the Council of Europe. Journal of Human Rights. 2015 Jan 23;14(1):41-62. Epub 2014 Nov 24. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2014.987737

Author

Bibtex

@article{c37bdc8349dc47e089cc50edb65296dc,
title = "Responsibility, emergency, blame: reporting on migrant deaths on the Mediterranean in the Council of Europe",
abstract = "In 2011 at least 1500 migrants perished in the Mediterranean en route to Europe. In one notable case 63 of 72 passengers of a refugee dinghy died in the course of a two-week drift. Despite communicating distress, they were left to die by passing military vessels and maritime authorities. This article analyzes the inquiry into this case conducted within the Council of Europe as a revealing instance of international human rights supervision. Through a focus on the practice of human rights reporting in instances of multiple institutional and moral failures, it shows how the rapporteur arrived at a politically acceptable account of who was responsible for the boat{\textquoteright}s tragedy. Distinguishing between the concepts of responsibility as duty and responsibility as guilt, the article considers the implications of privileging the former over the latter. It argues for a human rights practice that embraces a robust notion of responsibility which combines both.",
author = "Karolina Follis",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Human Rights, 14 (1), 2015, {\textcopyright} Informa Plc",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/14754835.2014.987737",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "41--62",
journal = "Journal of Human Rights",
issn = "1475-4835",
publisher = "Carfax Publishers",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsibility, emergency, blame

T2 - reporting on migrant deaths on the Mediterranean in the Council of Europe

AU - Follis, Karolina

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Human Rights, 14 (1), 2015, © Informa Plc

PY - 2015/1/23

Y1 - 2015/1/23

N2 - In 2011 at least 1500 migrants perished in the Mediterranean en route to Europe. In one notable case 63 of 72 passengers of a refugee dinghy died in the course of a two-week drift. Despite communicating distress, they were left to die by passing military vessels and maritime authorities. This article analyzes the inquiry into this case conducted within the Council of Europe as a revealing instance of international human rights supervision. Through a focus on the practice of human rights reporting in instances of multiple institutional and moral failures, it shows how the rapporteur arrived at a politically acceptable account of who was responsible for the boat’s tragedy. Distinguishing between the concepts of responsibility as duty and responsibility as guilt, the article considers the implications of privileging the former over the latter. It argues for a human rights practice that embraces a robust notion of responsibility which combines both.

AB - In 2011 at least 1500 migrants perished in the Mediterranean en route to Europe. In one notable case 63 of 72 passengers of a refugee dinghy died in the course of a two-week drift. Despite communicating distress, they were left to die by passing military vessels and maritime authorities. This article analyzes the inquiry into this case conducted within the Council of Europe as a revealing instance of international human rights supervision. Through a focus on the practice of human rights reporting in instances of multiple institutional and moral failures, it shows how the rapporteur arrived at a politically acceptable account of who was responsible for the boat’s tragedy. Distinguishing between the concepts of responsibility as duty and responsibility as guilt, the article considers the implications of privileging the former over the latter. It argues for a human rights practice that embraces a robust notion of responsibility which combines both.

U2 - 10.1080/14754835.2014.987737

DO - 10.1080/14754835.2014.987737

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 41

EP - 62

JO - Journal of Human Rights

JF - Journal of Human Rights

SN - 1475-4835

IS - 1

ER -