Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : pla...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : places and commonplaces.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : places and commonplaces. / Myers, G.; MacNaghten, P.
In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1998, p. 333-353.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Myers, G & MacNaghten, P 1998, 'Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : places and commonplaces.', Environment and Planning A, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1068/a300333

APA

Myers, G., & MacNaghten, P. (1998). Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : places and commonplaces. Environment and Planning A, 30(2), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1068/a300333

Vancouver

Myers G, MacNaghten P. Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : places and commonplaces. Environment and Planning A. 1998;30(2):333-353. doi: 10.1068/a300333

Author

Myers, G. ; MacNaghten, P. / Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : places and commonplaces. In: Environment and Planning A. 1998 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 333-353.

Bibtex

@article{5e4ecfb63be545a8af3e12e7d9f3fc98,
title = "Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : places and commonplaces.",
abstract = "Although a rhetoric of sustainability is now widely used by government,nongovernmental organisations, and business in addressing the public, there is no evidence of a broad shift of behaviour in response to it. Yet most sustainability programmes at international, national, and local levels require broad public participation if they are to reach their goals. We argue that organisational communication with the public is central to defining the form of participation that is expected, and that rhetorical analysis can show relationships that are implicit in these attempts to persuade. We analyse leaflets from a range of organisations to identify some of the elements that are common between them, both in their explicit content and their implied models of participation. Then we analyse the responses in focus groups to these common appeals. Our findings show that the generalised appeals and the rhetoric of crisis tend to distance policy organisations from the immediacy and dailiness of the public's own experiences of and talk about the environment. Because of this distance, the rhetoric does little to encourage participation and practical action.",
author = "G. Myers and P. MacNaghten",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1068/a300333",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "333--353",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rhetorics of environmental sustainability : places and commonplaces.

AU - Myers, G.

AU - MacNaghten, P.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Although a rhetoric of sustainability is now widely used by government,nongovernmental organisations, and business in addressing the public, there is no evidence of a broad shift of behaviour in response to it. Yet most sustainability programmes at international, national, and local levels require broad public participation if they are to reach their goals. We argue that organisational communication with the public is central to defining the form of participation that is expected, and that rhetorical analysis can show relationships that are implicit in these attempts to persuade. We analyse leaflets from a range of organisations to identify some of the elements that are common between them, both in their explicit content and their implied models of participation. Then we analyse the responses in focus groups to these common appeals. Our findings show that the generalised appeals and the rhetoric of crisis tend to distance policy organisations from the immediacy and dailiness of the public's own experiences of and talk about the environment. Because of this distance, the rhetoric does little to encourage participation and practical action.

AB - Although a rhetoric of sustainability is now widely used by government,nongovernmental organisations, and business in addressing the public, there is no evidence of a broad shift of behaviour in response to it. Yet most sustainability programmes at international, national, and local levels require broad public participation if they are to reach their goals. We argue that organisational communication with the public is central to defining the form of participation that is expected, and that rhetorical analysis can show relationships that are implicit in these attempts to persuade. We analyse leaflets from a range of organisations to identify some of the elements that are common between them, both in their explicit content and their implied models of participation. Then we analyse the responses in focus groups to these common appeals. Our findings show that the generalised appeals and the rhetoric of crisis tend to distance policy organisations from the immediacy and dailiness of the public's own experiences of and talk about the environment. Because of this distance, the rhetoric does little to encourage participation and practical action.

U2 - 10.1068/a300333

DO - 10.1068/a300333

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 333

EP - 353

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 2

ER -