Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of Inte...
View graph of relations

Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business. / Picciotto, Salomone.
In: Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 131-152.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Picciotto, S 2003, 'Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business.', Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 131-152. <http://journals.cdrs.columbia.edu/jtl/?p=27>

APA

Vancouver

Picciotto S. Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2003 Jan 1;42(1):131-152.

Author

Picciotto, Salomone. / Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business. In: Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2003 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 131-152.

Bibtex

@article{6ab8a505e2624eed84c4b0dd0d83da8d,
title = "Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business.",
abstract = "This essay discusses the paradox of the emergence of corporate codes of conduct in the 1990s, following pressures from consumer and labor activism, in a period of more general liberalization of international investment leading to deregulation. It suggests that the advantages of flexibility and adaptability to specific circumstances offered by such codes are counterbalanced by their self-selected content and inadequate enforcement. Rejecting the assumption that there is a sharp distinction between voluntary standards and binding law, the essay analyzes various ways of grounding codes in legal obligations. It proposes that a safer and more dependable environment for international investment could be provided by a framework agreement, which would link binding standards for corporate social responsibility in key areas, such as combating bribery and cooperation in tax enforcement, with traditional investor rights based on investor protection and liberalization rules.",
author = "Salomone Picciotto",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Law",
year = "2003",
month = jan,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "131--152",
journal = "Columbia Journal of Transnational Law",
issn = "0010-1931",
publisher = "Columbia Law Review Association",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business.

AU - Picciotto, Salomone

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Law

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - This essay discusses the paradox of the emergence of corporate codes of conduct in the 1990s, following pressures from consumer and labor activism, in a period of more general liberalization of international investment leading to deregulation. It suggests that the advantages of flexibility and adaptability to specific circumstances offered by such codes are counterbalanced by their self-selected content and inadequate enforcement. Rejecting the assumption that there is a sharp distinction between voluntary standards and binding law, the essay analyzes various ways of grounding codes in legal obligations. It proposes that a safer and more dependable environment for international investment could be provided by a framework agreement, which would link binding standards for corporate social responsibility in key areas, such as combating bribery and cooperation in tax enforcement, with traditional investor rights based on investor protection and liberalization rules.

AB - This essay discusses the paradox of the emergence of corporate codes of conduct in the 1990s, following pressures from consumer and labor activism, in a period of more general liberalization of international investment leading to deregulation. It suggests that the advantages of flexibility and adaptability to specific circumstances offered by such codes are counterbalanced by their self-selected content and inadequate enforcement. Rejecting the assumption that there is a sharp distinction between voluntary standards and binding law, the essay analyzes various ways of grounding codes in legal obligations. It proposes that a safer and more dependable environment for international investment could be provided by a framework agreement, which would link binding standards for corporate social responsibility in key areas, such as combating bribery and cooperation in tax enforcement, with traditional investor rights based on investor protection and liberalization rules.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 131

EP - 152

JO - Columbia Journal of Transnational Law

JF - Columbia Journal of Transnational Law

SN - 0010-1931

IS - 1

ER -