Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Risk information source preferences in construc...
View graph of relations

Risk information source preferences in construction workers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Risk information source preferences in construction workers. / Burns, Calvin; Conchie, Stacey.
In: Employee Relations, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2014, p. 70-81.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Burns C, Conchie S. Risk information source preferences in construction workers. Employee Relations. 2014;36(1):70-81. doi: 10.1108/ER-06-2013-0060

Author

Burns, Calvin ; Conchie, Stacey. / Risk information source preferences in construction workers. In: Employee Relations. 2014 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 70-81.

Bibtex

@article{f96cb32951104683b4ce137afa3c779a,
title = "Risk information source preferences in construction workers",
abstract = "Purpose – Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers{\textquoteright} risk-taking/unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers{\textquoteright} risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source's expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered).Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, safety manager, project manager, supervisor, workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (asbestos, back pain, site transport, heights, slips/trips, housekeeping, and site-specific and job-specific risks).Findings – The paper found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers{\textquoteright} risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise.Practical implications – The findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations.Originality/value – To the author's knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.",
keywords = "Construction workers, Occupational risk communication , Risk information source preference , Source expertise , Source proximity , Trust",
author = "Calvin Burns and Stacey Conchie",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1108/ER-06-2013-0060",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "70--81",
journal = "Employee Relations",
issn = "0142-5455",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk information source preferences in construction workers

AU - Burns, Calvin

AU - Conchie, Stacey

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose – Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers’ risk-taking/unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers’ risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source's expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered).Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, safety manager, project manager, supervisor, workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (asbestos, back pain, site transport, heights, slips/trips, housekeeping, and site-specific and job-specific risks).Findings – The paper found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers’ risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise.Practical implications – The findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations.Originality/value – To the author's knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.

AB - Purpose – Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers’ risk-taking/unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers’ risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source's expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered).Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, safety manager, project manager, supervisor, workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (asbestos, back pain, site transport, heights, slips/trips, housekeeping, and site-specific and job-specific risks).Findings – The paper found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers’ risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise.Practical implications – The findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations.Originality/value – To the author's knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.

KW - Construction workers

KW - Occupational risk communication

KW - Risk information source preference

KW - Source expertise

KW - Source proximity

KW - Trust

U2 - 10.1108/ER-06-2013-0060

DO - 10.1108/ER-06-2013-0060

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 70

EP - 81

JO - Employee Relations

JF - Employee Relations

SN - 0142-5455

IS - 1

ER -