Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sampling hurdles : “Borderline Illegitimate” to...
View graph of relations

Sampling hurdles : “Borderline Illegitimate” to legitimate data.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Sampling hurdles : “Borderline Illegitimate” to legitimate data. / Garg, Anupama.
In: International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2008.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Garg A. Sampling hurdles : “Borderline Illegitimate” to legitimate data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2008;7(4).

Author

Garg, Anupama. / Sampling hurdles : “Borderline Illegitimate” to legitimate data. In: International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2008 ; Vol. 7, No. 4.

Bibtex

@article{8c803601e38b4631b3447c40e5dfb50d,
title = "Sampling hurdles : “Borderline Illegitimate” to legitimate data.",
abstract = "In this paper the author discusses how sampling access and recruitment problems encountered in an in-depth interview study heightened her sensitivity to “borderline illegitimate” data. The term illegitimate data usually refers to the data collected during a covert study, whereas “legitimate” data are collected during an overt study. Hence, data collected during any nonconsented period(s) of an overt study lie on the borderline of illegitimacy and legitimacy, and constitute what the author calls borderline illegitimate data. Such data need legitimization before use. The borderline illegitimate data were collected during the pre- and postinterview stages of her study as they explained how medical and ethnic cultures and sensitivity to racism as a topic combined to create sample recruitment difficulties of the study. The author later legitimized them by sharing them with the participants, guaranteeing anonymity, and asking their permission to use them.",
keywords = "sampling, ethics, consent, borderline illegitimate data",
author = "Anupama Garg",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "International Journal of Qualitative Methods",
issn = "1609-4069",
publisher = "International Institute for Qualitative Methodology, University of Alberta",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sampling hurdles : “Borderline Illegitimate” to legitimate data.

AU - Garg, Anupama

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In this paper the author discusses how sampling access and recruitment problems encountered in an in-depth interview study heightened her sensitivity to “borderline illegitimate” data. The term illegitimate data usually refers to the data collected during a covert study, whereas “legitimate” data are collected during an overt study. Hence, data collected during any nonconsented period(s) of an overt study lie on the borderline of illegitimacy and legitimacy, and constitute what the author calls borderline illegitimate data. Such data need legitimization before use. The borderline illegitimate data were collected during the pre- and postinterview stages of her study as they explained how medical and ethnic cultures and sensitivity to racism as a topic combined to create sample recruitment difficulties of the study. The author later legitimized them by sharing them with the participants, guaranteeing anonymity, and asking their permission to use them.

AB - In this paper the author discusses how sampling access and recruitment problems encountered in an in-depth interview study heightened her sensitivity to “borderline illegitimate” data. The term illegitimate data usually refers to the data collected during a covert study, whereas “legitimate” data are collected during an overt study. Hence, data collected during any nonconsented period(s) of an overt study lie on the borderline of illegitimacy and legitimacy, and constitute what the author calls borderline illegitimate data. Such data need legitimization before use. The borderline illegitimate data were collected during the pre- and postinterview stages of her study as they explained how medical and ethnic cultures and sensitivity to racism as a topic combined to create sample recruitment difficulties of the study. The author later legitimized them by sharing them with the participants, guaranteeing anonymity, and asking their permission to use them.

KW - sampling

KW - ethics

KW - consent

KW - borderline illegitimate data

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

JO - International Journal of Qualitative Methods

JF - International Journal of Qualitative Methods

SN - 1609-4069

IS - 4

ER -