Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Security and the Subsurface

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Security and the Subsurface: Natural Gas and the Visualisation of Possibility Spaces

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Security and the Subsurface: Natural Gas and the Visualisation of Possibility Spaces. / Forman, Peter J.
In: Geopolitics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 143-166.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Forman PJ. Security and the Subsurface: Natural Gas and the Visualisation of Possibility Spaces. Geopolitics. 2020 Jan 1;25(1):143-166. Epub 2018 Oct 17. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2018.1513918

Author

Bibtex

@article{d6714876801746e89a8401f22919b556,
title = "Security and the Subsurface: Natural Gas and the Visualisation of Possibility Spaces",
abstract = "Beneath the surface of the United Kingdom lies a sprawling natural gas infrastructure. Based on recent (2014/15) {\textquoteleft}follow the thing{\textquoteright} fieldwork conducted in the UK onshore gas industry, this paper explores the ways that dangers related to the subterranean circulation of natural gas come to be visualised, and how these visualisations make possible different security interventions. These practices are shown to be limited by the ground, which despite its enrolment as a security device conceals from view the shifting landscapes of risk that surround these gaseous movements. Drawing on Manuel DeLanda's concept of the possibility space, I provide a conceptual framework for attending to security{\textquoteright}s visualisation practices, describing how attempts are made to overcome the subsurface obfuscation of natural gas. I argue that, rather than being understood as a process of circulatory {\textquoteleft}filtration{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}maintenance{\textquoteright}, security must instead be regarded as a series of transformative practices of ecological (re)organisation that are predicated upon the visualisation of entities{\textquoteright} spaces of possibility. In the process, I provide an account of how the three-dimensional geographies and materialities of gas circulations and their milieus are intimately tied up in their governance and politics.",
author = "Forman, {Peter J.}",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14650045.2018.1513918",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "143--166",
journal = "Geopolitics",
issn = "1465-0045",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Security and the Subsurface

T2 - Natural Gas and the Visualisation of Possibility Spaces

AU - Forman, Peter J.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Beneath the surface of the United Kingdom lies a sprawling natural gas infrastructure. Based on recent (2014/15) ‘follow the thing’ fieldwork conducted in the UK onshore gas industry, this paper explores the ways that dangers related to the subterranean circulation of natural gas come to be visualised, and how these visualisations make possible different security interventions. These practices are shown to be limited by the ground, which despite its enrolment as a security device conceals from view the shifting landscapes of risk that surround these gaseous movements. Drawing on Manuel DeLanda's concept of the possibility space, I provide a conceptual framework for attending to security’s visualisation practices, describing how attempts are made to overcome the subsurface obfuscation of natural gas. I argue that, rather than being understood as a process of circulatory ‘filtration’ or ‘maintenance’, security must instead be regarded as a series of transformative practices of ecological (re)organisation that are predicated upon the visualisation of entities’ spaces of possibility. In the process, I provide an account of how the three-dimensional geographies and materialities of gas circulations and their milieus are intimately tied up in their governance and politics.

AB - Beneath the surface of the United Kingdom lies a sprawling natural gas infrastructure. Based on recent (2014/15) ‘follow the thing’ fieldwork conducted in the UK onshore gas industry, this paper explores the ways that dangers related to the subterranean circulation of natural gas come to be visualised, and how these visualisations make possible different security interventions. These practices are shown to be limited by the ground, which despite its enrolment as a security device conceals from view the shifting landscapes of risk that surround these gaseous movements. Drawing on Manuel DeLanda's concept of the possibility space, I provide a conceptual framework for attending to security’s visualisation practices, describing how attempts are made to overcome the subsurface obfuscation of natural gas. I argue that, rather than being understood as a process of circulatory ‘filtration’ or ‘maintenance’, security must instead be regarded as a series of transformative practices of ecological (re)organisation that are predicated upon the visualisation of entities’ spaces of possibility. In the process, I provide an account of how the three-dimensional geographies and materialities of gas circulations and their milieus are intimately tied up in their governance and politics.

U2 - 10.1080/14650045.2018.1513918

DO - 10.1080/14650045.2018.1513918

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 143

EP - 166

JO - Geopolitics

JF - Geopolitics

SN - 1465-0045

IS - 1

ER -