Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Seeing violence in the weather
T2 - the apocalyptic rhetoric of climate-driven conflict
AU - Jackson, Stephen
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The deeply worrying prospect of a global catastrophe frequently operates as theconceptual backdrop of rhetoric meant to convey the dangers of climate change. In recent years, however, concerns about climate change have given rise to postapocalyptic forecasts of a future where the crisis overwhelmingly shapes andpropels social conflict. Such forecasts impart tremendous causal power to climatechange, while simultaneously foreclosing human agency and responsibility.Although such warnings are often made by campaigners trying to raise awarenessabout climate change, their Hobbesian character has also found a receptiveaudience among defence professionals who perceive climate change as anemerging national security threat. Military think tanks, for instance, have beendeveloping scenarios in which climate change generates terrorism, politicalradicalisation, and internationally-destabilizing levels of human migration. Thischapter argues that this climatic turn in defence policy discourse has emerged not only out of the need to (re)legitimate hegemonic power, but also becausemainstream apocalyptic rhetoric about climate change constructs the unmitigatedfuture as a state of global emergency. To explore these concerns, I consider theinterplay between popular apocalyptic rhetoric and the emerging field of climatesecurity.
AB - The deeply worrying prospect of a global catastrophe frequently operates as theconceptual backdrop of rhetoric meant to convey the dangers of climate change. In recent years, however, concerns about climate change have given rise to postapocalyptic forecasts of a future where the crisis overwhelmingly shapes andpropels social conflict. Such forecasts impart tremendous causal power to climatechange, while simultaneously foreclosing human agency and responsibility.Although such warnings are often made by campaigners trying to raise awarenessabout climate change, their Hobbesian character has also found a receptiveaudience among defence professionals who perceive climate change as anemerging national security threat. Military think tanks, for instance, have beendeveloping scenarios in which climate change generates terrorism, politicalradicalisation, and internationally-destabilizing levels of human migration. Thischapter argues that this climatic turn in defence policy discourse has emerged not only out of the need to (re)legitimate hegemonic power, but also becausemainstream apocalyptic rhetoric about climate change constructs the unmitigatedfuture as a state of global emergency. To explore these concerns, I consider theinterplay between popular apocalyptic rhetoric and the emerging field of climatesecurity.
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781848883529
SP - 101
EP - 126
BT - Imagining the end
A2 - Bishop, Thomas E.
A2 - Strong, Jeremy R.
PB - Inter-disciplinary Press
CY - Oxford
ER -