Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Semantic processing in "associative" false memory
View graph of relations

Semantic processing in "associative" false memory

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineLiterature reviewpeer-review

Published

Standard

Semantic processing in "associative" false memory. / Brainerd, C. J.; Yang, C.; Reyna, V. F. et al.
In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 15, No. 6, 12.2008, p. 1035-1053.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineLiterature reviewpeer-review

Harvard

Brainerd, CJ, Yang, C, Reyna, VF, Howe, ML & Mills, BA 2008, 'Semantic processing in "associative" false memory', Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1035-1053. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035

APA

Brainerd, C. J., Yang, C., Reyna, V. F., Howe, M. L., & Mills, B. A. (2008). Semantic processing in "associative" false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(6), 1035-1053. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035

Vancouver

Brainerd CJ, Yang C, Reyna VF, Howe ML, Mills BA. Semantic processing in "associative" false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2008 Dec;15(6):1035-1053. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035

Author

Brainerd, C. J. ; Yang, C. ; Reyna, V. F. et al. / Semantic processing in "associative" false memory. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 1035-1053.

Bibtex

@article{c57cd20dfbf2489d928c9057b0a48068,
title = "Semantic processing in {"}associative{"} false memory",
abstract = "We studied the semantic properties of a class of illusions, of which the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is the most prominent example, in which subjects falsely remember words that are associates of studied words. We analyzed DRM materials for 16 dimensions of semantic content and assessed the ability of these dimensions to predict interlist variability in false memory. For the more general class of illusions, we analyzed pairs of presented and unpresented words that varied in associative strength for the presence of these same 16 semantic properties. DRM materials proved to be exceptionally rich in meaning, as indexed by these semantic properties. Variability in false recall, false recognition, and backward associative strength loaded on a single semantic factor (familiarity/meaningfulness), whereas variability in true recall loaded on a quite different factor (imagery/concreteness). For word association generally, 15 semantic properties varied reliably with forward or backward association between words. Implications for semantic versus associative processing in this class of illusions, for dual-process theories, and for semantic properties of word associations are discussed.",
keywords = "FUZZY-TRACE THEORY, REMEMBERING WORDS, LEXICAL DECISION, INTENTIONAL PROCESSES, CONJOINT RECOGNITION, RETENTION INTERVAL, VERBATIM MEMORY, DRM PARADIGM, RECALL, LISTS",
author = "Brainerd, {C. J.} and C. Yang and Reyna, {V. F.} and Howe, {M. L.} and Mills, {B. A.}",
note = "Theoretical and Review Articles ",
year = "2008",
month = dec,
doi = "10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1035--1053",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Semantic processing in "associative" false memory

AU - Brainerd, C. J.

AU - Yang, C.

AU - Reyna, V. F.

AU - Howe, M. L.

AU - Mills, B. A.

N1 - Theoretical and Review Articles

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - We studied the semantic properties of a class of illusions, of which the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is the most prominent example, in which subjects falsely remember words that are associates of studied words. We analyzed DRM materials for 16 dimensions of semantic content and assessed the ability of these dimensions to predict interlist variability in false memory. For the more general class of illusions, we analyzed pairs of presented and unpresented words that varied in associative strength for the presence of these same 16 semantic properties. DRM materials proved to be exceptionally rich in meaning, as indexed by these semantic properties. Variability in false recall, false recognition, and backward associative strength loaded on a single semantic factor (familiarity/meaningfulness), whereas variability in true recall loaded on a quite different factor (imagery/concreteness). For word association generally, 15 semantic properties varied reliably with forward or backward association between words. Implications for semantic versus associative processing in this class of illusions, for dual-process theories, and for semantic properties of word associations are discussed.

AB - We studied the semantic properties of a class of illusions, of which the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is the most prominent example, in which subjects falsely remember words that are associates of studied words. We analyzed DRM materials for 16 dimensions of semantic content and assessed the ability of these dimensions to predict interlist variability in false memory. For the more general class of illusions, we analyzed pairs of presented and unpresented words that varied in associative strength for the presence of these same 16 semantic properties. DRM materials proved to be exceptionally rich in meaning, as indexed by these semantic properties. Variability in false recall, false recognition, and backward associative strength loaded on a single semantic factor (familiarity/meaningfulness), whereas variability in true recall loaded on a quite different factor (imagery/concreteness). For word association generally, 15 semantic properties varied reliably with forward or backward association between words. Implications for semantic versus associative processing in this class of illusions, for dual-process theories, and for semantic properties of word associations are discussed.

KW - FUZZY-TRACE THEORY

KW - REMEMBERING WORDS

KW - LEXICAL DECISION

KW - INTENTIONAL PROCESSES

KW - CONJOINT RECOGNITION

KW - RETENTION INTERVAL

KW - VERBATIM MEMORY

KW - DRM PARADIGM

KW - RECALL

KW - LISTS

U2 - 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035

DO - 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035

M3 - Literature review

VL - 15

SP - 1035

EP - 1053

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 6

ER -