Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in ze...
View graph of relations

Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches. / Royle, Nick J.; Hartley, Ian R.; Parker, Geoff A.
In: Nature, Vol. 416, No. 6882, 18.04.2002, p. 733-736.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Royle, NJ, Hartley, IR & Parker, GA 2002, 'Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches.', Nature, vol. 416, no. 6882, pp. 733-736. https://doi.org/10.1038/416733a

APA

Vancouver

Royle NJ, Hartley IR, Parker GA. Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches. Nature. 2002 Apr 18;416(6882):733-736. doi: 10.1038/416733a

Author

Royle, Nick J. ; Hartley, Ian R. ; Parker, Geoff A. / Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches. In: Nature. 2002 ; Vol. 416, No. 6882. pp. 733-736.

Bibtex

@article{10ce97333b0d49589242f068d784d29d,
title = "Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches.",
abstract = "Parental care is often costly1; hence, in sexually reproducing species where both male and female parents rear their offspring (biparental care), sexual conflict over parental investment can arise2. Such conflict occurs because each care-giver would benefit from withholding parental investment for use with another partner, leading to a reduction in the amount of care given by one parent at the expense of the other3, 4, 5. Here we report experiments to explore the prediction from theory that parents rearing offspring alone may provide greater parental investment than when rearing offspring together with a partner3, 5. We found that when the number of offspring per parent, and hence the potential workload, were kept constant, offspring received a greater per capita parental investment from single females than from both parents working together, and that males reared by single mothers were more sexually attractive as adults than their biparentally reared siblings. This difference between single- and two-parent families is due to a reduction in care provided by females when they care together with a male, rather than laziness by males or differences in the begging behaviour of chicks, supporting the claim that sexual conflict in biparental care can reduce the quality of offspring raised.",
author = "Royle, {Nick J.} and Hartley, {Ian R.} and Parker, {Geoff A.}",
year = "2002",
month = apr,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1038/416733a",
language = "English",
volume = "416",
pages = "733--736",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6882",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches.

AU - Royle, Nick J.

AU - Hartley, Ian R.

AU - Parker, Geoff A.

PY - 2002/4/18

Y1 - 2002/4/18

N2 - Parental care is often costly1; hence, in sexually reproducing species where both male and female parents rear their offspring (biparental care), sexual conflict over parental investment can arise2. Such conflict occurs because each care-giver would benefit from withholding parental investment for use with another partner, leading to a reduction in the amount of care given by one parent at the expense of the other3, 4, 5. Here we report experiments to explore the prediction from theory that parents rearing offspring alone may provide greater parental investment than when rearing offspring together with a partner3, 5. We found that when the number of offspring per parent, and hence the potential workload, were kept constant, offspring received a greater per capita parental investment from single females than from both parents working together, and that males reared by single mothers were more sexually attractive as adults than their biparentally reared siblings. This difference between single- and two-parent families is due to a reduction in care provided by females when they care together with a male, rather than laziness by males or differences in the begging behaviour of chicks, supporting the claim that sexual conflict in biparental care can reduce the quality of offspring raised.

AB - Parental care is often costly1; hence, in sexually reproducing species where both male and female parents rear their offspring (biparental care), sexual conflict over parental investment can arise2. Such conflict occurs because each care-giver would benefit from withholding parental investment for use with another partner, leading to a reduction in the amount of care given by one parent at the expense of the other3, 4, 5. Here we report experiments to explore the prediction from theory that parents rearing offspring alone may provide greater parental investment than when rearing offspring together with a partner3, 5. We found that when the number of offspring per parent, and hence the potential workload, were kept constant, offspring received a greater per capita parental investment from single females than from both parents working together, and that males reared by single mothers were more sexually attractive as adults than their biparentally reared siblings. This difference between single- and two-parent families is due to a reduction in care provided by females when they care together with a male, rather than laziness by males or differences in the begging behaviour of chicks, supporting the claim that sexual conflict in biparental care can reduce the quality of offspring raised.

U2 - 10.1038/416733a

DO - 10.1038/416733a

M3 - Journal article

VL - 416

SP - 733

EP - 736

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 6882

ER -