Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Social differentiation in the use of English vo...

Electronic data

  • rlh97.pdf

    Accepted author manuscript, 61 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. / Rayson, Paul; Leech, Geoffrey; Hodges, Mary.
In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1997, p. 133-152.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Rayson P, Leech G, Hodges M. Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 1997;2(1):133-152. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.2.1.07ray

Author

Bibtex

@article{5295a33137f64537a6509dedde2cec41,
title = "Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus",
abstract = "In this article we undertake selective quantitative analyses of the demographically-sampled spoken English component of the British National Corpus (for brevity, referred to here as the Conversational Corpus). This is a subcorpus of c.4.5 million words, in which speakers and respondents are identified by such factors as gender, age, social group and geographical region. Using a corpus analysis tool developed at Lancaster University, we undertake a comparison of the vocabulary of speakers, highlighting those differences which are marked by a very high chi-squared value of difference between different sectors of the corpus according gender, age and social group. A fourth variable, that of geographical region of the United Kingdom, is not investigated in this article, although it remains a promising subject for future research. (As background we also briefly examine differences between spoken and written material in the British National Corpus (BNC).) This study is illustrative of the potentiality of the Conversational Corpus for future corpus-based research on social differentiation in the use of language. There are evident limitations, including (a) the reliance on vocabulary frequency lists, and (b) the simplicity of the transcription system employed for the spoken part of the BNC. The conclusion of the article considers future advances in the research paradigm illustrated here.",
keywords = "British National Corpus, spoken English vocabulary frequency, chi-squared test",
author = "Paul Rayson and Geoffrey Leech and Mary Hodges",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1075/ijcl.2.1.07ray",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "133--152",
journal = "International Journal of Corpus Linguistics",
issn = "1569-9811",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus

AU - Rayson, Paul

AU - Leech, Geoffrey

AU - Hodges, Mary

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - In this article we undertake selective quantitative analyses of the demographically-sampled spoken English component of the British National Corpus (for brevity, referred to here as the Conversational Corpus). This is a subcorpus of c.4.5 million words, in which speakers and respondents are identified by such factors as gender, age, social group and geographical region. Using a corpus analysis tool developed at Lancaster University, we undertake a comparison of the vocabulary of speakers, highlighting those differences which are marked by a very high chi-squared value of difference between different sectors of the corpus according gender, age and social group. A fourth variable, that of geographical region of the United Kingdom, is not investigated in this article, although it remains a promising subject for future research. (As background we also briefly examine differences between spoken and written material in the British National Corpus (BNC).) This study is illustrative of the potentiality of the Conversational Corpus for future corpus-based research on social differentiation in the use of language. There are evident limitations, including (a) the reliance on vocabulary frequency lists, and (b) the simplicity of the transcription system employed for the spoken part of the BNC. The conclusion of the article considers future advances in the research paradigm illustrated here.

AB - In this article we undertake selective quantitative analyses of the demographically-sampled spoken English component of the British National Corpus (for brevity, referred to here as the Conversational Corpus). This is a subcorpus of c.4.5 million words, in which speakers and respondents are identified by such factors as gender, age, social group and geographical region. Using a corpus analysis tool developed at Lancaster University, we undertake a comparison of the vocabulary of speakers, highlighting those differences which are marked by a very high chi-squared value of difference between different sectors of the corpus according gender, age and social group. A fourth variable, that of geographical region of the United Kingdom, is not investigated in this article, although it remains a promising subject for future research. (As background we also briefly examine differences between spoken and written material in the British National Corpus (BNC).) This study is illustrative of the potentiality of the Conversational Corpus for future corpus-based research on social differentiation in the use of language. There are evident limitations, including (a) the reliance on vocabulary frequency lists, and (b) the simplicity of the transcription system employed for the spoken part of the BNC. The conclusion of the article considers future advances in the research paradigm illustrated here.

KW - British National Corpus

KW - spoken English vocabulary frequency

KW - chi-squared test

U2 - 10.1075/ijcl.2.1.07ray

DO - 10.1075/ijcl.2.1.07ray

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 133

EP - 152

JO - International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

JF - International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

SN - 1569-9811

IS - 1

ER -