Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sperm, clinics, and parenthood

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Sperm, clinics, and parenthood

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>10/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Bioethics
Issue number8
Volume30
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)618-627
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date15/08/16
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In this article I examine a recent approach to regulating assisted reproduction, whereby use of some kind of medical intervention ‘triggers’ laws governing legal parenthood that are more favourable to intending parents and sperm providers. I argue that although perhaps an improvement on the previous legal framework, these laws are problematic for three important reasons. First, they are prone to violating parental rights and unjustly imposing substantial burdens on individuals. Second, they are discriminatory. Third, even if we take a pragmatic approach to the question of parenthood in these cases, these laws fail to properly consider the welfare interests of children. Finally, I conclude by showing that my argument does not entail adopting a laissez-fair attitude to conception using third-party sperm.