Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed ...

Research

Electronic data

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed Wearable Activity Recognition

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review

Published

Standard

Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed Wearable Activity Recognition. / Van Laerhoven, Kristof; Gellersen, Hans.
Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004. IEEE Press, 2004. p. 142-150.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review

Harvard

Van Laerhoven, K & Gellersen, H 2004, Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed Wearable Activity Recognition. in Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004. IEEE Press, pp. 142-150, Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004, Arlington, VA, 1/01/00. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2004.40

APA

Van Laerhoven, K., & Gellersen, H. (2004). Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed Wearable Activity Recognition. In Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004 (pp. 142-150). IEEE Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2004.40

Vancouver

Van Laerhoven K, Gellersen H. Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed Wearable Activity Recognition. In Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004. IEEE Press. 2004. p. 142-150 doi: 10.1109/ISWC.2004.40

Author

Van Laerhoven, Kristof ; Gellersen, Hans. / Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed Wearable Activity Recognition. Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004. IEEE Press, 2004. pp. 142-150

Bibtex

@inproceedings{eae38fd47571474e949b32603bad0fd8,
title = "Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed Wearable Activity Recognition",
abstract = "This paper seeks to explore an alternative and more embedded-oriented approach to the recognition of a person{\textquoteright}s motion and pose, using sensor types that can easily be distributed in clothing. A large proportion of this type of research so far has been carried out with carefully positioned accelerometers, resulting in fairly good recognition rates. An alternative approach targets a more pervasive sensing vision where the clothing is saturated with small, embedded sensors. By increasing the quantity of sensors, while decreasing their individual information quality, a preliminary comparative study between the two approaches looks at the pros, cons, and differences in algorithm requirements.",
keywords = "cs_eprint_id, 997 cs_uid, 1",
author = "{Van Laerhoven}, Kristof and Hans Gellersen",
year = "2004",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1109/ISWC.2004.40",
language = "English",
pages = "142--150",
booktitle = "Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004",
publisher = "IEEE Press",
note = "Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004 ; Conference date: 01-01-1900",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Spine versus Porcupine: a Study in Distributed Wearable Activity Recognition

AU - Van Laerhoven, Kristof

AU - Gellersen, Hans

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - This paper seeks to explore an alternative and more embedded-oriented approach to the recognition of a person’s motion and pose, using sensor types that can easily be distributed in clothing. A large proportion of this type of research so far has been carried out with carefully positioned accelerometers, resulting in fairly good recognition rates. An alternative approach targets a more pervasive sensing vision where the clothing is saturated with small, embedded sensors. By increasing the quantity of sensors, while decreasing their individual information quality, a preliminary comparative study between the two approaches looks at the pros, cons, and differences in algorithm requirements.

AB - This paper seeks to explore an alternative and more embedded-oriented approach to the recognition of a person’s motion and pose, using sensor types that can easily be distributed in clothing. A large proportion of this type of research so far has been carried out with carefully positioned accelerometers, resulting in fairly good recognition rates. An alternative approach targets a more pervasive sensing vision where the clothing is saturated with small, embedded sensors. By increasing the quantity of sensors, while decreasing their individual information quality, a preliminary comparative study between the two approaches looks at the pros, cons, and differences in algorithm requirements.

KW - cs_eprint_id

KW - 997 cs_uid

KW - 1

U2 - 10.1109/ISWC.2004.40

DO - 10.1109/ISWC.2004.40

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SP - 142

EP - 150

BT - Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004

PB - IEEE Press

T2 - Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers ISWC 2004

Y2 - 1 January 1900

ER -