Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Standards of review in international investment...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Standards of review in international investment law and arbitration: multilevel governance and the commonweal

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Standards of review in international investment law and arbitration : multilevel governance and the commonweal. / Vadi, Valentina; Gruszczynski, Lukasz.

In: Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 16, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 613-633.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Vadi, Valentina ; Gruszczynski, Lukasz. / Standards of review in international investment law and arbitration : multilevel governance and the commonweal. In: Journal of International Economic Law. 2013 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 613-633.

Bibtex

@article{f6ef78e93a064e2d893eabdda930a4e4,
title = "Standards of review in international investment law and arbitration: multilevel governance and the commonweal",
abstract = "Investment treaty tribunals have increasingly touched upon delicate issues, including for example access to water, public health or cultural polices. What standard of review have they adopted vis-{\`a}-vis state regulation aimed to protect fundamental interests and values? Can ideas regarding the standards of review be borrowed from other national and international systems; and if so, which one should be selected? Or, rather, due to its hybrid nature investment law scholars should develop specific standards of review only for investment law and arbitration? Far from being merely theoretical, these questions touch upon the legitimacy of international investment law and arbitration as a component of multilevel governance which now characterizes international (economic) relations. Investigating these questions can contribute to the alignment of general international law and investment protection, reinforcing the capacity of international investment law to contribute to the public wealth. The article submits that while a standard of complete deference to national measures would run against the very purpose of international investment law; an overly intrusive standard is neither a feasible option. In this context the authors consider standards developed within the WTO as a possible model for international arbitration tribunals.",
author = "Valentina Vadi and Lukasz Gruszczynski",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1093/jiel/jgt022",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "613--633",
journal = "Journal of International Economic Law",
issn = "1369-3034",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standards of review in international investment law and arbitration

T2 - multilevel governance and the commonweal

AU - Vadi, Valentina

AU - Gruszczynski, Lukasz

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Investment treaty tribunals have increasingly touched upon delicate issues, including for example access to water, public health or cultural polices. What standard of review have they adopted vis-à-vis state regulation aimed to protect fundamental interests and values? Can ideas regarding the standards of review be borrowed from other national and international systems; and if so, which one should be selected? Or, rather, due to its hybrid nature investment law scholars should develop specific standards of review only for investment law and arbitration? Far from being merely theoretical, these questions touch upon the legitimacy of international investment law and arbitration as a component of multilevel governance which now characterizes international (economic) relations. Investigating these questions can contribute to the alignment of general international law and investment protection, reinforcing the capacity of international investment law to contribute to the public wealth. The article submits that while a standard of complete deference to national measures would run against the very purpose of international investment law; an overly intrusive standard is neither a feasible option. In this context the authors consider standards developed within the WTO as a possible model for international arbitration tribunals.

AB - Investment treaty tribunals have increasingly touched upon delicate issues, including for example access to water, public health or cultural polices. What standard of review have they adopted vis-à-vis state regulation aimed to protect fundamental interests and values? Can ideas regarding the standards of review be borrowed from other national and international systems; and if so, which one should be selected? Or, rather, due to its hybrid nature investment law scholars should develop specific standards of review only for investment law and arbitration? Far from being merely theoretical, these questions touch upon the legitimacy of international investment law and arbitration as a component of multilevel governance which now characterizes international (economic) relations. Investigating these questions can contribute to the alignment of general international law and investment protection, reinforcing the capacity of international investment law to contribute to the public wealth. The article submits that while a standard of complete deference to national measures would run against the very purpose of international investment law; an overly intrusive standard is neither a feasible option. In this context the authors consider standards developed within the WTO as a possible model for international arbitration tribunals.

U2 - 10.1093/jiel/jgt022

DO - 10.1093/jiel/jgt022

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 613

EP - 633

JO - Journal of International Economic Law

JF - Journal of International Economic Law

SN - 1369-3034

IS - 3

ER -